Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cytoplasmic localization of p21Cip1/WAF1 by Akt-induced phosphorylation in HER-2/neu-overexpressing cells
2001915 citationsBinhua P. Zhou, Yong Liao et al.Nature Cell Biologyprofile →
HER-2/neu induces p53 ubiquitination via Akt-mediated MDM2 phosphorylation
2001749 citationsBinhua P. Zhou, Yong Liao et al.Nature Cell Biologyprofile →
β-Catenin, a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer: Its roles in cyclin D1 expression and cancer progression
2000672 citationsShiaw‐Yih Lin, Weiya Xia et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Spohn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Spohn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Spohn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Spohn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Spohn. The network helps show where Bill Spohn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bill Spohn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bill Spohn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bill Spohn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bill Spohn. Bill Spohn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wen, Yong, Duen‐Hwa Yan, Bailiang Wang, et al.. (2001). p202, an interferon-inducible protein, mediates multiple antitumor activities in human pancreatic cancer xenograft models.. PubMed. 61(19). 7142–7.32 indexed citations
13.
Wen, Yong, et al.. (2000). Tumor suppression and sensitization to tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis by an interferon-inducible protein, p202, in breast cancer cells.. PubMed. 60(1). 42–6.36 indexed citations
14.
Wen, Yong, Mickey C.‐T. Hu, Keishi Makino, et al.. (2000). HER-2/neu promotes androgen-independent survival and growth of prostate cancer cells through the Akt pathway.. PubMed. 60(24). 6841–5.364 indexed citations
15.
Lin, Shiaw‐Yih, Weiya Xia, Ka Yin Kwong, et al.. (2000). β-Catenin, a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer: Its roles in cyclin D1 expression and cancer progression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97(8). 4262–4266.672 indexed citations breakdown →
Spohn, Bill, et al.. (1983). Comparison of urine cytology versus fine needle aspiration cytology in monitoring renal allograft dysfunction.. PubMed. 19. 495–9.3 indexed citations
19.
Sprenger, K., et al.. (1983). Improvement of uremic neuropathy and hypogeusia by dialysate zinc supplementation: a double-blind study.. PubMed. 16. S315–8.48 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.