Beth Howden

522 citations
8 papers · 317 indexed · h-index 7

Beth Howden

8 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Beth Howden
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 111
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 149
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 172
  • General Health Professions 88
  • Reproductive Medicine 24
Replace William F. McCool with:
William F. McCool United States
Peter St. Marie United States
Erin McClain United States
Jessica L. Gleason United States
Kyra A. Sim Australia
Virginia H. Kemp United States
Chanda Karki Nepal
Magali Steinecker France
Henok Kumsa Ethiopia
Win Khaing Myanmar
Beth Howden relative to William F. McCool United States William F. McCool's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
William F. McCool · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Howden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Howden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Howden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Howden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Howden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Howden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Howden. The network helps show where Beth Howden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Beth Howden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Howden Line = papers co-authored together Beth Howden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 20202
2 201920
3 201726
4 201655
5 201532
6 2014147
7
Eligibility for the Family Nurse Partnership programme: testing new criteria
20127
8
The Family-Nurse Partnership programme in England: wave 1 implementation in toddlerhood and a comparison between waves 1 and 2a of implementation in pregnancy and infancy
201128

About Beth Howden

Beth Howden is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1 paper), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (111 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (149 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (172 citations), General Health Professions (88 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (24 citations). Beth Howden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dilisha Patel, Judith Stephenson, Jill Shawe, Pranav Pandya, Geraldine Barrett, Andrew Copas, Mog Ball, Jacqueline Barnes, Patrick G. Kehoe and Clare Clement. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, PLoS ONE and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026