Beth Howden

522 total citations
8 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Beth Howden is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Beth Howden has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 3 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Beth Howden's work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Beth Howden is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Contraception (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Beth Howden collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Beth Howden's co-authors include Dilisha Patel, Jill Shawe, Judith Stephenson, Pranav Pandya, Geraldine Barrett, Andrew Copas, Jacqueline Barnes, Mog Ball, Patrick G. Kehoe and Lucy Selman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

In The Last Decade

Beth Howden

8 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Beth Howden United Kingdom	7	172	149	111	88	27	8	317
Jessica L. Gleason United States	10	102 0.6×	124 0.8×	95 0.9×	18 0.2×	25 0.9×	39	308
William F. McCool United States	13	112 0.7×	100 0.7×	118 1.1×	82 0.9×	63 2.3×	28	347
Peter St. Marie United States	12	87 0.5×	95 0.6×	53 0.5×	51 0.6×	8 0.3×	21	286
Magali Steinecker France	5	172 1.0×	46 0.3×	90 0.8×	50 0.6×	46 1.7×	7	269
Kyra A. Sim Australia	9	150 0.9×	154 1.0×	135 1.2×	84 1.0×	12 0.4×	22	422
Win Khaing Myanmar	7	89 0.5×	127 0.9×	101 0.9×	73 0.8×	14 0.5×	14	382
Shereen Hamadneh Jordan	9	50 0.3×	79 0.5×	58 0.5×	26 0.3×	37 1.4×	43	245
Mona Almalik Jordan	8	83 0.5×	74 0.5×	43 0.4×	96 1.1×	51 1.9×	16	294
Erin McClain United States	6	113 0.7×	63 0.4×	26 0.2×	71 0.8×	22 0.8×	13	293
Andrea Akkad United Kingdom	6	139 0.8×	25 0.2×	26 0.2×	176 2.0×	28 1.0×	8	287

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Howden

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Howden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Howden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Howden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Howden

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Howden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Howden. The network helps show where Beth Howden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Howden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Howden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Howden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Howden. Beth Howden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Barrett, Geraldine, Jennifer Hall, Beth Howden, et al.. (2020). Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy for Women’s Partners. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). e65–e77. 2 indexed citations

Clement, Clare, Lucy Selman, Patrick G. Kehoe, et al.. (2019). Challenges to and Facilitators of Recruitment to an Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trial: A Qualitative Interview Study. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 69(4). 1067–1075. 20 indexed citations

Kehoe, Patrick G., Peter S Blair, Beth Howden, et al.. (2017). The Rationale and Design of the Reducing Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease through Angiotensin TaRgeting (RADAR) Trial. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 61(2). 803–814. 26 indexed citations

Patel, Dilisha, et al.. (2016). General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and views of providing preconception care: a qualitative investigation. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 121(4). 256–263. 55 indexed citations

Barrett, Geraldine, Jill Shawe, Beth Howden, et al.. (2015). Why do women invest in pre-pregnancy health and care? A qualitative investigation with women attending maternity services. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 15(1). 236–236. 32 indexed citations

Stephenson, Judith, Dilisha Patel, Geraldine Barrett, et al.. (2014). How Do Women Prepare for Pregnancy? Preconception Experiences of Women Attending Antenatal Services and Views of Health Professionals. PLoS ONE. 9(7). e103085–e103085. 147 indexed citations

Barnes, Jacqueline, et al.. (2012). Eligibility for the Family Nurse Partnership programme: testing new criteria. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London). 7 indexed citations

Barnes, Jacqueline, et al.. (2011). The Family-Nurse Partnership programme in England: wave 1 implementation in toddlerhood and a comparison between waves 1 and 2a of implementation in pregnancy and infancy. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact