Beth Gardner

5.4k total citations
83 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Beth Gardner is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Beth Gardner has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 75 papers in Ecology, 24 papers in Ecological Modeling and 18 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Beth Gardner's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (60 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (24 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (22 papers). Beth Gardner is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (60 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (24 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (22 papers). Beth Gardner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Beth Gardner's co-authors include J. Andrew Royle, Rahel Sollmann, Marc Kéry, Allan F. O’Connell, Jerrold L. Belant, Christian Monnerat, Mauro Lucherini, Juan I. Reppucci, Torbjørn Ergon and Michael V. Cove and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Beth Gardner

80 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Beth Gardner United States 33 3.1k 1.2k 905 490 480 83 3.7k
Brett T. McClintock United States 29 2.3k 0.7× 768 0.6× 562 0.6× 377 0.8× 270 0.6× 53 2.8k
Paul M. Lukacs United States 29 2.3k 0.7× 701 0.6× 623 0.7× 409 0.8× 463 1.0× 100 3.0k
Tiago A. Marques United Kingdom 36 4.7k 1.5× 874 0.7× 1.1k 1.2× 1.1k 2.2× 219 0.5× 141 5.6k
Jeff Laake United States 21 4.0k 1.3× 740 0.6× 1.2k 1.3× 1.1k 2.1× 245 0.5× 32 4.6k
Catherine A. Langtimm United States 18 3.9k 1.3× 1.6k 1.3× 1.5k 1.7× 1.1k 2.2× 314 0.7× 33 4.5k
Eric A. Rexstad United States 25 3.2k 1.1× 736 0.6× 1.0k 1.1× 809 1.7× 243 0.5× 52 3.9k
Edward O. Garton United States 31 3.3k 1.1× 606 0.5× 891 1.0× 671 1.4× 417 0.9× 81 3.9k
Paul F. Doherty United States 30 2.3k 0.7× 536 0.4× 782 0.9× 590 1.2× 353 0.7× 130 3.0k
Bruce N. McLellan Canada 41 4.2k 1.4× 719 0.6× 629 0.7× 476 1.0× 954 2.0× 75 4.5k
Andrew J. Tyre United States 28 2.3k 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 1.6k 1.8× 909 1.9× 318 0.7× 87 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Gardner. The network helps show where Beth Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Gardner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Gardner. Beth Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tingley, Morgan W., et al.. (2024). Hazardous wildfire smoke events can alter dawn soundscapes in dry forests of central and eastern Washington, United States. Global Ecology and Conservation. 54. e03044–e03044.
2.
Bassing, Sarah B., et al.. (2024). Predator–prey space use and landscape features influence movement behaviors in a large‐mammal community. Ecology. 105(11). e4448–e4448. 4 indexed citations
4.
Amburgey, Staci M., Amy A. Yackel Adams, Beth Gardner, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of camera trap‐based abundance estimators for unmarked populations. Ecological Applications. 31(7). e02410–e02410. 22 indexed citations
5.
Augustine, Ben C., et al.. (2021). A spatial capture–recapture model for group‐living species. Ecology. 103(10). e3576–e3576. 14 indexed citations
6.
Moorman, Christopher E., et al.. (2020). Nesting Ecology of Northern Bobwhite on a Working Farm. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 44(4). 677–683. 10 indexed citations
7.
Lewis, Jeffrey C., et al.. (2019). Habitat selection and spatiotemporal interactions of a reintroduced mesocarnivore. Journal of Wildlife Management. 83(5). 1172–1184. 13 indexed citations
8.
Hostetter, Nathan J., Beth Gardner, T. Scott Sillett, Kenneth H. Pollock, & Theodore R. Simons. (2019). An integrated model decomposing the components of detection probability and abundance in unmarked populations. Ecosphere. 10(3). 21 indexed citations
9.
Cove, Michael V., et al.. (2016). Evaluating nest supplementation as a recovery strategy for the endangered rodents of the Florida Keys. Restoration Ecology. 25(2). 253–260. 25 indexed citations
10.
Gardner, Beth, et al.. (2015). Key seabird areas in southern New England identified using a community occupancy model. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 533. 277–290. 6 indexed citations
11.
Haddad, Nick M., et al.. (2015). Point-count methods to monitor butterfly populations when traditional methods fail: a case study with Miami blue butterfly. Journal of Insect Conservation. 19(3). 519–529. 23 indexed citations
12.
Gardner, Beth, et al.. (2015). Using Fecal DNA and Spatial Capture-Recapture to Characterize a Recent Coyote Colonization. Northeastern Naturalist. 22(1). 144–162. 6 indexed citations
13.
Martin, Julien, Holly H. Edwards, Florent Bled, et al.. (2014). Estimating Upper Bounds for Occupancy and Number of Manatees in Areas Potentially Affected by Oil from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. PLoS ONE. 9(3). e91683–e91683. 12 indexed citations
14.
Reich, Brian J. & Beth Gardner. (2014). A spatial capture‐recapture model for territorial species. Environmetrics. 25(8). 630–637. 29 indexed citations
15.
Gardner, Beth, et al.. (2013). A spatial capture–recapture model to estimate fish survival and location from linear continuous monitoring arrays. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 71(1). 120–130. 35 indexed citations
16.
Sollmann, Rahel, Beth Gardner, Richard B. Chandler, et al.. (2013). Using multiple data sources provides density estimates for endangered Florida panther. Journal of Applied Ecology. 50(4). 961–968. 75 indexed citations
17.
Moorman, Christopher E., et al.. (2012). Small mammal use of field borders planted as beneficial insect habitat. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 37(1). 209–215. 9 indexed citations
18.
Curtis, Paul D., et al.. (2012). Temporal sampling frame selection in DNA-based capture–mark–recapture investigations. Ursus. 23(1). 42–51. 7 indexed citations
19.
Golovin, Daniel, et al.. (2011). Dynamic Resource Allocation in Conservation Planning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 25(1). 1331–1336. 22 indexed citations
20.
Gardner, Beth, et al.. (2008). Hierarchical modeling of bycatch rates of sea turtles in the western North Atlantic. Endangered Species Research. 5. 279–289. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026