Bert Spenkelink
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Ivonne M.C.M. RietjensAns PuntMarelle G. BoersmaJelmer J. van ZandenNicole H.P. CnubbenLaura de HaanG.M. AlinkPeter J. van Bladeren
- Topics
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (10 papers)Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (7 papers)Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsThailandJordan
In The Last Decade
Bert Spenkelink
35 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 323
- Molecular Biology 296
- Biochemistry 172
- Cancer Research 170
- Plant Science 165
Countries citing papers authored by Bert Spenkelink
This map shows the geographic impact of Bert Spenkelink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert Spenkelink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert Spenkelink more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bert Spenkelink
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert Spenkelink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert Spenkelink. The network helps show where Bert Spenkelink may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bert Spenkelink
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bert Spenkelink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bert Spenkelink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bert Spenkelink. Bert Spenkelink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 60 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Monitoring exposure and effects of polyhalogeneted aromatic hydrocarbons (PHAHs) in European otters (Lutra lutra). | 3 |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Bert Spenkelink
Bert Spenkelink is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Cancer Research, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (10 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (7 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (172 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (323 citations) and Pharmacology (108 citations). Bert Spenkelink has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Thailand and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Ivonne M.C.M. Rietjens, Ans Punt, Marelle G. Boersma, Jelmer J. van Zanden, Nicole H.P. Cnubben, Laura de Haan, G.M. Alink, Peter J. van Bladeren, Hester van der Woude and Hanem M. Awad. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Chemosphere.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.