Bert Maat

2.3k total citations
33 papers, 799 citations indexed

About

Bert Maat is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Bert Maat has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 799 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 papers in Sensory Systems and 17 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Bert Maat's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (26 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (18 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (17 papers). Bert Maat is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (26 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (18 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (17 papers). Bert Maat collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and France. Bert Maat's co-authors include Wilko Grolman, Rolien H. Free, Christina D. Fuller, Deniz Başkent, Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus, John J. Galvin, R. A. Tange, Hero P. Wit, Wouter A. Dreschler and Bert G.A. van Zanten and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, The Laryngoscope and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Bert Maat

32 papers receiving 781 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bert Maat Netherlands 16 709 449 322 90 89 33 799
Deborah Mawman United Kingdom 20 797 1.1× 543 1.2× 343 1.1× 72 0.8× 242 2.7× 39 1.0k
Gregory A. Flamme United States 17 592 0.8× 462 1.0× 493 1.5× 71 0.8× 48 0.5× 50 838
Andrea Hedley‐Williams United States 11 598 0.8× 401 0.9× 271 0.8× 155 1.7× 91 1.0× 14 640
Alicia Huarte Spain 14 775 1.1× 502 1.1× 316 1.0× 110 1.2× 146 1.6× 47 844
Catherine V. Palmer United States 18 859 1.2× 420 0.9× 614 1.9× 117 1.3× 68 0.8× 75 1.1k
Lois J. Matthews United States 19 900 1.3× 808 1.8× 612 1.9× 99 1.1× 77 0.9× 44 1.2k
Kathy R. Vander Werff United States 14 701 1.0× 530 1.2× 215 0.7× 63 0.7× 127 1.4× 22 841
Geert De Ceulaer Belgium 18 738 1.0× 615 1.4× 252 0.8× 113 1.3× 218 2.4× 32 993
Angelika Illg Germany 18 811 1.1× 560 1.2× 307 1.0× 60 0.7× 171 1.9× 42 918
David A. Fabry United States 19 590 0.8× 292 0.7× 386 1.2× 255 2.8× 123 1.4× 51 850

Countries citing papers authored by Bert Maat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert Maat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert Maat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert Maat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert Maat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert Maat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert Maat. The network helps show where Bert Maat may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bert Maat

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bert Maat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bert Maat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bert Maat. Bert Maat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harding, Eleanor, Étienne Gaudrain, Barbara Tillmann, et al.. (2025). Vocal and musical emotion perception, voice cue discrimination, and quality of life in cochlear implant users with and without acoustic hearing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 688172307–688172307. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gaudrain, Étienne, Eleanor Harding, R. L. Harris, et al.. (2024). Speech-on-speech perception in adult cochlear implant users: Benefits from voice differences. 1857–1861.
3.
Manley, Geoffrey A., et al.. (2024). Otoacoustic emissions in African mole-rats. Hearing Research. 445. 108994–108994. 1 indexed citations
4.
Dijk, J. Marc C. van, et al.. (2019). An auditory brainstem implant for treatment of unilateral tinnitus: protocol for an interventional pilot study. BMJ Open. 9(6). e026185–e026185. 4 indexed citations
5.
Riet, Gerben ter, et al.. (2018). Development and evaluation of a blended educational programme for general practitioners’ trainers to stimulate proactive HIV testing. BMC Family Practice. 19(1). 36–36. 9 indexed citations
6.
Ramakers, Geerte G. J., Yvette E. Smulders, Alice van Zon, et al.. (2017). Objective and Subjective Measures of Simultaneous vs Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Adults. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 143(9). 881–881. 23 indexed citations
7.
Smulders, Yvette E., Alice van Zon, Inge Stegeman, et al.. (2015). Cost–Utility of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults. Otology & Neurotology. 37(1). 38–45. 31 indexed citations
8.
Fuller, Christina D., et al.. (2014). The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 8. 179–179. 73 indexed citations
9.
Sparreboom, Marloes, Bert G.A. van Zanten, Rob Scholten, et al.. (2013). The Effectiveness of Bilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe-to-Profound Deafness in Adults. Otology & Neurotology. 34(2). 190–198. 78 indexed citations
10.
Fuller, Christina D., et al.. (2013). Music and Quality of Life in Early-Deafened Late-Implanted Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Otology & Neurotology. 34(6). 1041–1047. 19 indexed citations
11.
Dijk, Pim van, Bert Maat, & Emile de Kleine. (2010). The Effect of Static Ear Canal Pressure on Human Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions: Spectral Width as a Measure of the Intra-cochlear Oscillation Amplitude. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 12(1). 13–28. 13 indexed citations
12.
Sparreboom, Marloes, Bert G.A. van Zanten, Rob Scholten, et al.. (2010). The Effectiveness of Bilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe-to-Profound Deafness in Children. Otology & Neurotology. 31(7). 1062–1071. 50 indexed citations
13.
Grolman, Wilko, Bert Maat, Froukje J. Verdam, et al.. (2008). Spread of Excitation Measurements for the Detection of Electrode Array Foldovers. Otology & Neurotology. 30(1). 27–33. 75 indexed citations
14.
Maat, Bert, et al.. (2008). Comparison of speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise after hearing aid fitting according to a purely prescriptive and a comparative fitting procedure. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 265(9). 1113–1120. 9 indexed citations
16.
Maat, Bert, et al.. (2007). Comparative studies on hearing aid selection and fitting procedures: a review of the literature. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 265(1). 21–29. 4 indexed citations
17.
Carelsen, Bart, Wilko Grolman, R. A. Tange, et al.. (2007). Cochlear implant electrode array insertion monitoring with intra‐operative 3D rotational X‐ray. Clinical Otolaryngology. 32(1). 46–50. 38 indexed citations
18.
Tange, R. A., Wilko Grolman, & Bert Maat. (2005). Intracochlear misdirected implantation of a cochlear implant. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 126(6). 650–652. 57 indexed citations
19.
Avan, Paul, Béla Büki, Bert Maat, M Dordain, & Hero P. Wit. (2000). Middle ear influence on otoacoustic emissions. I: Noninvasive investigation of the human transmission apparatus and comparison with model results. Hearing Research. 140(1-2). 189–201. 68 indexed citations
20.
Dijk, Pim van, Bert Maat, & Hero P. Wit. (1997). Wiener Kernel Analysis of a Noise-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission. British Journal of Audiology. 31(6). 473–477. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026