Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernard Foing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernard Foing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernard Foing more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernard Foing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernard Foing. The network helps show where Bernard Foing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernard Foing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernard Foing.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernard Foing based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bernard Foing. Bernard Foing is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ončák, Milan, N. Przybilla, Helgi Rafn Hróðmarsson, et al.. (2025). The EDIBLES survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 695. A212–A212.
Westrenen, W. van, et al.. (2020). Lunar and Martian Regolith Based Concrete as Building Blocks for Future Human Settlements. LPI. 2878.1 indexed citations
8.
Foing, Bernard, et al.. (2018). Mapping Synergies: Sustainable Development Goals and Research & Technology in Space Architecture and Human Spaceflight. European Planetary Science Congress.3 indexed citations
9.
Foing, Bernard, et al.. (2017). MaMBA - a functional Moon and Mars Base Analog. European Planetary Science Congress.1 indexed citations
10.
Foing, Bernard, et al.. (2016). Eifel field operation campaign supporting Moon Mars and NEO exploration. 41.1 indexed citations
11.
Foing, Bernard, et al.. (2015). ExoLab Space Mission Simulation: Expanding life with art & science. EPSC.
12.
Foing, Bernard, C. Stoker, P. Ehrenfreund, et al.. (2010). Eurogeomars Field Campaingn: Sample Analysis of Organic Matter and Minerals. LPICo. 1538. 5656.2 indexed citations
13.
Foing, Bernard, et al.. (2010). Moon-Mars Analogue Mission (EuroMoonMars 1 at the Mars Desert Research Station). 38. 7.1 indexed citations
14.
Veillet, C. & Bernard Foing. (2007). SMART-1 Impact Observation at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. LPI. 1520.7 indexed citations
15.
Benkhoff, J., F. Forget, S. R. Lewis, et al.. (2005). Subsurface water ice stability on Mars – current and past climates. elib (German Aerospace Center). 65(6). 1225–30.1 indexed citations
Foing, Bernard & B. Battrick. (2002). Proceedings of the 36th ESLAB Symposium, Earth-like planets and moons : 3-8 June 2002, ESTEC, Noordwijk, the Netherlands.2 indexed citations
Foing, Bernard, et al.. (1999). ESA SMART-1 Mission to the Moon. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1. 2052.1 indexed citations
20.
Foing, Bernard & R. Laureijs. (1998). Science Exploration of the Moon with the European Space Agency SMART-1 Mission. LPICo. 957. 7.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.