Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cointegration analysis in the presence of structural breaks in the deterministic trend
This map shows the geographic impact of Bent Nielsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bent Nielsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bent Nielsen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bent Nielsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bent Nielsen. The network helps show where Bent Nielsen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bent Nielsen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bent Nielsen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bent Nielsen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bent Nielsen. Bent Nielsen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Monden, Christiaan, et al.. (2018). Age-period-cohort modelling and covariates, with an application to obesity in England 2001-2014. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Nielsen, Bent, et al.. (2009). Asymptotic behaviour of the CUSUM of squares test under stochastic and deterministic time trends. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
11.
Hendry, David F. & Bent Nielsen. (2007). Econometric Modeling. Princeton University Press eBooks.50 indexed citations
12.
Nielsen, Bent. (2004). Threshold levels for seed borne diseases in organic cereals. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 5(3-4). 298–304.1 indexed citations
13.
Nielsen, Bent, et al.. (2004). Short-Run Parameter Changes in a Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Model.. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).3 indexed citations
14.
Barndorff–Nielsen, Ole E., et al.. (2002). Measuring and forecasting financial variability using realised variance with and without a model. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).9 indexed citations
Jørgensen, Lise Nistrup & Bent Nielsen. (1990). Control of leaf diseases in winter wheat using ergosterol inhibiting fungicides. 94(2). 241–248.1 indexed citations
17.
Jørgensen, Lars Nannestad & Bent Nielsen. (1990). Control of eyespot (Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides (Fron.) Deighton) using prochloraz. - Dose and timing.. 94(2). 233–239.2 indexed citations
Wennerström, Olof, et al.. (1976). Propellicene or Bi-2,13-pentahelicenylene.. Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry. 30b. 688–690.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.