Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: A 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines
Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Lengelé
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Lengelé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Lengelé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Lengelé more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Lengelé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Lengelé. The network helps show where Benoît Lengelé may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benoît Lengelé
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benoît Lengelé.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benoît Lengelé based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Benoît Lengelé. Benoît Lengelé is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alexander, Ashlin J., Daniel S. Alam, Patrick Gullane, Benoît Lengelé, & Peter A. Adamson. (2010). Arguing the Ethics of Facial Transplantation. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 12(1). 60–63.3 indexed citations
12.
Alexander, Ashlin J., Daniel S. Alam, Patrick Gullane, Benoît Lengelé, & Peter A. Adamson. (2010). Arguing the Ethics of Facial Transplantation. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 12(1). 60–3.13 indexed citations
13.
Lengelé, Benoît. (2008). Peut-on greffer un visage ? Bilan raisonné et perspectives futures d'une première chirurgicale conçue aux confins de la science, du mythe et de la réalité. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique. 163.1 indexed citations
14.
Lengelé, Benoît. (2007). [The rebuilt face: ethics, techniques and results of the first face allograft].. PubMed. 162(3-4). 179–91.1 indexed citations
15.
Dakpé, Stéphanie, et al.. (2004). The reverse helical chondrocutaneous free flap in distal nose reconstruction : technical refinements, extended indications and anatomical limits. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 32. 120.1 indexed citations
16.
Geers, Caroline, Frédéric Lecouvet, Catherine Behets, et al.. (2003). Polygonal deformation of the dural sac in lumbar epidural lipomatosis: anatomic explanation by the presence of meningovertebral ligaments.. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 24(7). 1276–82.34 indexed citations
17.
Devauchelle, B., et al.. (2002). Microsurgical miniflaps in facial reconstruction. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 30. 19.1 indexed citations
18.
Lengelé, Benoît. (2001). Le visage, le masque et le temps. Histoire naturelle de l'architecture segmentaire de la face.. 156(7). 377–392.1 indexed citations
19.
Behets, Catherine, et al.. (2001). Les branches performantes antérieures des artères intercostales. Un nouveau pédicule segmentaire pour le lambeau médial du muscle grand pectoral. Morphologie. 85. 5.2 indexed citations
20.
Reynaert, Marc, et al.. (1988). Pancréatite aiguë nécrosante. Traitement des masses nécrotiques stériles et infectées.. Acta gastro-enterologica belgica. 51(1). 44–50.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.