Benjamin T. Vincent

1.2k total citations
25 papers, 836 citations indexed

About

Benjamin T. Vincent is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin T. Vincent has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 836 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in General Decision Sciences and 9 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Benjamin T. Vincent's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (8 papers). Benjamin T. Vincent is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (8 papers). Benjamin T. Vincent collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and France. Benjamin T. Vincent's co-authors include Benjamin W. Tatler, Roland Baddeley, Roland Baddeley, Iain D. Gilchrist, Tom Trościanko, T. Troscianko, Ute Leonards, Claudia González‐Vallejo, Pepper Schedin and Peter Lloyd Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, American Journal Of Pathology and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin T. Vincent

24 papers receiving 824 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin T. Vincent United Kingdom 15 572 384 199 108 97 25 836
Casimir J. H. Ludwig United Kingdom 23 1.4k 2.4× 238 0.6× 137 0.7× 150 1.4× 341 3.5× 55 1.7k
Paul A. Warren United Kingdom 18 774 1.4× 176 0.5× 74 0.4× 24 0.2× 138 1.4× 60 1.1k
Eugene McSorley United Kingdom 21 983 1.7× 114 0.3× 113 0.6× 151 1.4× 296 3.1× 49 1.3k
J. Najemnik United States 6 776 1.4× 463 1.2× 232 1.2× 92 0.9× 76 0.8× 9 1.0k
Anna Montagnini France 16 809 1.4× 96 0.3× 104 0.5× 39 0.4× 107 1.1× 44 984
Alexander A. Petrov United States 12 842 1.5× 78 0.2× 72 0.4× 58 0.5× 231 2.4× 48 1.1k
Dave M. Stampe Canada 7 633 1.1× 168 0.4× 247 1.2× 61 0.6× 289 3.0× 7 1.0k
Melina A. Kunar United Kingdom 20 781 1.4× 172 0.4× 66 0.3× 37 0.3× 204 2.1× 49 1.1k
Mackenzie G. Glaholt Canada 14 521 0.9× 93 0.2× 116 0.6× 82 0.8× 188 1.9× 25 810
Taylor R. Hayes United States 17 676 1.2× 465 1.2× 182 0.9× 213 2.0× 209 2.2× 44 952

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin T. Vincent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin T. Vincent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin T. Vincent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin T. Vincent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin T. Vincent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin T. Vincent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin T. Vincent. The network helps show where Benjamin T. Vincent may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin T. Vincent

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin T. Vincent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin T. Vincent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin T. Vincent. Benjamin T. Vincent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vincent, Benjamin T., et al.. (2022). Discounting for Money, Food, and Sex, over the Menstrual Cycle. Evolutionary Psychological Science. 9(1). 71–81. 2 indexed citations
2.
Lloyd, Alex, Ryan McKay, Todd K. Hartman, et al.. (2021). Delay discounting and under-valuing of recent information predict poorer adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 19237–19237. 10 indexed citations
3.
O’Connor, David, Benjamin T. Vincent, Uli Bromberg, et al.. (2021). Rewards that are near increase impulsive action. iScience. 24(4). 102292–102292. 5 indexed citations
4.
Vincent, Benjamin T. & Neil Stewart. (2020). The case of muddled units in temporal discounting. Cognition. 198. 104203–104203. 6 indexed citations
5.
González‐Vallejo, Claudia, et al.. (2020). Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 149(12). 2289–2313. 19 indexed citations
6.
Vincent, Benjamin T., et al.. (2020). Temporal discounting does not influence body mass index. Physiology & Behavior. 221. 112893–112893. 3 indexed citations
7.
Vincent, Benjamin T., et al.. (2019). Hunger increases delay discounting of food and non-food rewards. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 26(5). 1729–1737. 35 indexed citations
8.
Vincent, Benjamin T. & Tom Rainforth. (2017). The DARC Toolbox: automated, flexible, and efficient delayed and risky choice experiments using Bayesian adaptive design. Open Science Framework. 3 indexed citations
9.
Vincent, Benjamin T.. (2015). Hierarchical Bayesian estimation and hypothesis testing for delay discounting tasks. Behavior Research Methods. 48(4). 1608–1620. 47 indexed citations
10.
Vincent, Benjamin T.. (2015). Bayesian accounts of covert selective attention: A tutorial review. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 77(4). 1013–1032. 12 indexed citations
11.
Vincent, Benjamin T.. (2012). How do we use the past to predict the future in oculomotor search?. Vision Research. 74. 93–101. 3 indexed citations
12.
Vincent, Benjamin T.. (2011). Search asymmetries: Parallel processing of uncertain sensory information. Vision Research. 51(15). 1741–1750. 16 indexed citations
13.
Vincent, Benjamin T.. (2011). Covert visual search: Prior beliefs are optimally combined with sensory evidence. Journal of Vision. 11(13). 25–25. 22 indexed citations
14.
Taraseviciute, Agne, Benjamin T. Vincent, Pepper Schedin, & Peter Lloyd Jones. (2009). Quantitative Analysis of Three-Dimensional Human Mammary Epithelial Tissue Architecture Reveals a Role for Tenascin-C in Regulating c-Met Function. American Journal Of Pathology. 176(2). 827–838. 15 indexed citations
15.
Vincent, Benjamin T., Roland Baddeley, T. Troscianko, & Iain D. Gilchrist. (2009). Optimal feature integration in visual search. Journal of Vision. 9(5). 15–15. 65 indexed citations
16.
Vincent, Benjamin T., et al.. (2009). Do we look at lights? Using mixture modelling to distinguish between low- and high-level factors in natural image viewing. Visual Cognition. 17(6-7). 856–879. 50 indexed citations
17.
Tatler, Benjamin W. & Benjamin T. Vincent. (2008). Systematic tendencies in scene viewing. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 2(2). 164 indexed citations
18.
Vincent, Benjamin T., Tom Trościanko, & Iain D. Gilchrist. (2007). Investigating a space-variant weighted salience account of visual selection. Vision Research. 47(13). 1809–1820. 21 indexed citations
19.
Tatler, Benjamin W., Roland Baddeley, & Benjamin T. Vincent. (2006). The long and the short of it: Spatial statistics at fixation vary with saccade amplitude and task. Vision Research. 46(12). 1857–1862. 133 indexed citations
20.
Vincent, Benjamin T. & Roland Baddeley. (2003). Synaptic energy efficiency in retinal processing. Vision Research. 43(11). 1285–1292. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026