Benjamin Gläßle

678 total citations
10 papers, 440 citations indexed

About

Benjamin Gläßle is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Gläßle has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 440 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1 paper in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 1 paper in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Gläßle's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (10 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (9 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (9 papers). Benjamin Gläßle is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (10 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (9 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (9 papers). Benjamin Gläßle collaborates with scholars based in Germany, India and Poland. Benjamin Gläßle's co-authors include Gunnar Bali, Andreas Schäfer, M. Göckeler, Gergely Endrődi, Sara Collins, André Sternbeck, Rainer W. Schiel, Johannes Najjar, Wolfgang Söldner and Philipp Wein and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Gläßle

10 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Gläßle Germany 8 423 39 31 14 5 10 440
Srijit Paul Germany 7 296 0.7× 15 0.4× 23 0.7× 13 0.9× 3 0.6× 15 307
K. Miura Japan 4 311 0.7× 18 0.5× 29 0.9× 9 0.6× 3 0.6× 8 327
Chung-Wen Kao Taiwan 11 262 0.6× 27 0.7× 32 1.0× 6 0.4× 6 1.2× 19 267
Andrew Pochinsky United States 7 755 1.8× 39 1.0× 14 0.5× 19 1.4× 4 0.8× 12 766
R. J. Tweedie United Kingdom 9 486 1.1× 40 1.0× 19 0.6× 16 1.1× 3 0.6× 14 500
Ghil-Seok Yang South Korea 13 349 0.8× 17 0.4× 25 0.8× 8 0.6× 4 0.8× 26 353
Jonas Wilhelm Germany 8 271 0.6× 22 0.6× 11 0.4× 11 0.8× 3 0.6× 15 287
Denis Parganlija Germany 6 391 0.9× 25 0.6× 46 1.5× 15 1.1× 2 0.4× 12 402
T. Yoshié Japan 7 441 1.0× 29 0.7× 12 0.4× 33 2.4× 6 1.2× 9 453
R. D. Kenway United Kingdom 6 319 0.8× 15 0.4× 17 0.5× 11 0.8× 4 0.8× 9 324

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Gläßle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Gläßle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Gläßle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Gläßle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Gläßle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Gläßle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Gläßle. The network helps show where Benjamin Gläßle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Gläßle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Gläßle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Gläßle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Gläßle. Benjamin Gläßle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Bali, Gunnar, Markus Diehl, Jonathan R. Gaunt, et al.. (2021). Double parton distributions in the pion from lattice QCD. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2021(2). 6 indexed citations
2.
Bali, Gunnar, Bastian B. Brandt, Gergely Endrődi, & Benjamin Gläßle. (2018). Weak Decay of Magnetized Pions. Physical Review Letters. 121(7). 72001–72001. 24 indexed citations
3.
Bali, Gunnar, V. M. Braun, Benjamin Gläßle, et al.. (2018). Pion distribution amplitude from Euclidean correlation functions: Exploring universality and higher-twist effects. Physical review. D. 98(9). 83 indexed citations
4.
Bali, Gunnar, et al.. (2018). Meson masses in electromagnetic fields with Wilson fermions. Physical review. D. 97(3). 81 indexed citations
5.
Bali, Gunnar, et al.. (2018). Baryonic and mesonic 3-point functions with open spin indices. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 175. 6014–6014. 3 indexed citations
6.
Bali, Gunnar, Sara Collins, Benjamin Gläßle, et al.. (2015). Nucleon isovector couplings fromNf=2lattice QCD. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(5). 85 indexed citations
7.
Bali, Gunnar, Sara Collins, Benjamin Gläßle, et al.. (2014). The momentxudof the nucleon fromNf=2lattice QCD down to nearly physical quark masses. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(7). 30 indexed citations
8.
Braun, V. M., Sara Collins, Benjamin Gläßle, et al.. (2014). Light-cone distribution amplitudes of the nucleon and negative parity nucleon resonances from lattice QCD. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 89(9). 33 indexed citations
9.
Bali, Gunnar, Peter C. Bruns, Sara Collins, et al.. (2012). Nucleon mass and sigma term from lattice QCD with two light fermion flavors. Nuclear Physics B. 866(1). 1–25. 70 indexed citations
10.
Bali, Gunnar, Sara Collins, Mridupawan Deka, et al.. (2012). xudfrom lattice QCD at nearly physical quark masses. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(5). 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026