Benjamin E. Slentz

589 total citations
8 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

Benjamin E. Slentz is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin E. Slentz has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 4 papers in Spectroscopy and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Benjamin E. Slentz's work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (5 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (4 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers). Benjamin E. Slentz is often cited by papers focused on Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (5 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (4 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers). Benjamin E. Slentz collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. Benjamin E. Slentz's co-authors include Natalia A. Penner, Fred E. Regnier, Halina D. Inerowicz and Hamid Mirzaei and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A and Journal of Proteome Research.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin E. Slentz

8 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Benjamin E. Slentz United States	8	377	198	105	81	25	8	484
Stéphane Mouradian United States	6	277 0.7×	135 0.7×	126 1.2×	81 1.0×	12 0.5×	6	428
James R. Kraly United States	7	319 0.8×	105 0.5×	110 1.0×	59 0.7×	39 1.6×	7	408
Masaya Kakuta Japan	8	281 0.7×	35 0.2×	85 0.8×	49 0.6×	12 0.5×	13	352
Tim Wehr United States	9	474 1.3×	133 0.7×	114 1.1×	57 0.7×	34 1.4×	14	549
Qinglu Mao Canada	8	288 0.8×	53 0.3×	57 0.5×	52 0.6×	19 0.8×	10	332
G. Stegeman Netherlands	7	245 0.6×	232 1.2×	84 0.8×	14 0.2×	18 0.7×	9	359
Jeffrey Y. Pan United States	11	166 0.4×	44 0.2×	111 1.1×	85 1.0×	6 0.2×	24	346
Murat Tümer Türkiye	6	215 0.6×	70 0.4×	231 2.2×	57 0.7×	34 1.4×	15	381
Rajiv Bharadwaj United States	10	550 1.5×	28 0.1×	92 0.9×	120 1.5×	36 1.4×	14	597
Michael J. Eggertson United States	8	265 0.7×	213 1.1×	113 1.1×	19 0.2×	11 0.4×	13	394

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin E. Slentz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin E. Slentz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin E. Slentz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin E. Slentz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin E. Slentz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin E. Slentz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin E. Slentz. The network helps show where Benjamin E. Slentz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin E. Slentz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin E. Slentz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin E. Slentz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin E. Slentz. Benjamin E. Slentz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Penner, Natalia A., et al.. (2003). Contributions of commercial sorbents to the selectivity in immobilized metal affinity chromatography with Cu(II). Journal of Chromatography A. 1031(1-2). 87–92. 40 indexed citations

Penner, Natalia A., et al.. (2003). Evaluating Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography for the Selection of Histidine-Containing Peptides in Comparative Proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research. 2(3). 321–329. 24 indexed citations

Penner, Natalia A., et al.. (2003). Histidine-Rich Peptide Selection and Quantification in Targeted Proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research. 3(1). 37–45. 26 indexed citations

Slentz, Benjamin E., Natalia A. Penner, & Fred E. Regnier. (2002). Protein proteolysis and the multi-dimensional electrochromatographic separation of histidine-containing peptide fragments on a chip. Journal of Chromatography A. 984(1). 97–107. 84 indexed citations

Slentz, Benjamin E., Natalia A. Penner, & Fred E. Regnier. (2002). Geometric effects of collocated monolithic support structures on separation performance in microfabricated systems. Journal of Separation Science. 25(15-17). 1011–1018. 45 indexed citations

Slentz, Benjamin E., Natalia A. Penner, & Fred E. Regnier. (2002). Sampling BIAS at Channel Junctions in Gated Flow Injection on Chips. Analytical Chemistry. 74(18). 4835–4840. 49 indexed citations

Slentz, Benjamin E., Natalia A. Penner, & Fred E. Regnier. (2002). Capillary electrochromatography of peptides on microfabricated poly(dimethylsiloxane) chips modified by cerium(IV)-catalyzed polymerization. Journal of Chromatography A. 948(1-2). 225–233. 111 indexed citations

Slentz, Benjamin E., et al.. (2001). Nanoliter capillary electrochromatography columns based on collocated monolithic support structures molded in poly(dimethyl siloxane). Electrophoresis. 22(17). 3736–3743. 105 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact