Ben Young

789 total citations
23 papers, 622 citations indexed

About

Ben Young is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Automotive Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben Young has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 622 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Environmental Engineering, 5 papers in Automotive Engineering and 5 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Ben Young's work include Environmental Impact and Sustainability (12 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (5 papers) and Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (4 papers). Ben Young is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Impact and Sustainability (12 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (5 papers) and Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (4 papers). Ben Young collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Poland. Ben Young's co-authors include Troy R. Hawkins, Pingping Sun, Amgad Elgowainy, Michael Wang, Ben Morelli, Zifeng Lü, Wesley W. Ingwersen, Peter Douglas, Troy A. Hottle and Ulises R. Gracida-Alvarez and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Science & Technology and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

Ben Young

21 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ben Young United States 13 198 118 117 117 92 23 622
Xiaomin Xie China 15 112 0.6× 81 0.7× 192 1.6× 58 0.5× 104 1.1× 22 596
Maria Vahdati United Kingdom 13 155 0.8× 233 2.0× 211 1.8× 124 1.1× 27 0.3× 34 1.0k
Mariliis Lehtveer Sweden 13 71 0.4× 144 1.2× 236 2.0× 181 1.5× 43 0.5× 18 765
Marco Buffi Italy 14 555 2.8× 229 1.9× 42 0.4× 217 1.9× 162 1.8× 31 962
George G. Zaimes United States 15 284 1.4× 208 1.8× 192 1.6× 195 1.7× 21 0.2× 27 716
Wendell de Queiróz Lamas Brazil 12 71 0.4× 114 1.0× 54 0.5× 141 1.2× 25 0.3× 51 591
Usman Ali Pakistan 15 273 1.4× 61 0.5× 72 0.6× 384 3.3× 29 0.3× 33 683
Takao Nakagaki Japan 17 184 0.9× 81 0.7× 122 1.0× 302 2.6× 25 0.3× 62 594
Muhammad Akram United Kingdom 16 294 1.5× 54 0.5× 65 0.6× 316 2.7× 25 0.3× 38 637
Olusegun Stanley Tomomewo United States 14 89 0.4× 165 1.4× 159 1.4× 199 1.7× 36 0.4× 92 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Young. The network helps show where Ben Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Young. Ben Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Cashman, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Carbon Footprint of Oxygenated Gasolines: Case Studies in Latin America, Asia, and Europe. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 123–136. 1 indexed citations
3.
Young, Ben, et al.. (2024). Dataset of 2012-2020 U.S. National- and State-Level Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector. Data in Brief. 53. 110173–110173. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ingwersen, Wesley W., et al.. (2022). USEEIO v2.0, The US Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Model v2.0. Scientific Data. 9(1). 194–194. 35 indexed citations
5.
Ingwersen, Wesley W., et al.. (2022). useeior: An Open-Source R Package for Building and Using US Environmentally-Extended Input–Output Models. Applied Sciences. 12(9). 4469–4469. 5 indexed citations
6.
Cashman, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Life Cycle Data Interoperability Improvements through Implementation of the Federal LCA Commons Elementary Flow List. Applied Sciences. 12(19). 9687–9687. 1 indexed citations
7.
Young, Ben, et al.. (2022). A System for Standardizing and Combining U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Emissions and Waste Inventory Data. Applied Sciences. 12(7). 3447–3447. 18 indexed citations
8.
Young, Ben, et al.. (2022). FLOWSA: A Python Package Attributing Resource Use, Waste, Emissions, and Other Flows to Industries. Applied Sciences. 12(11). 5742–5742. 9 indexed citations
9.
Hottle, Troy A., Troy R. Hawkins, Ben Young, et al.. (2022). Environmental life-cycle assessment of concrete produced in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production. 363. 131834–131834. 52 indexed citations
10.
Young, Ben, et al.. (2022). Environmental life cycle assessment of olefins and by-product hydrogen from steam cracking of natural gas liquids, naphtha, and gas oil. Journal of Cleaner Production. 359. 131884–131884. 51 indexed citations
11.
Jiang, Yuan, George G. Zaimes, Shuyun Li, et al.. (2022). Economic and environmental analysis to evaluate the potential value of co-optima diesel bioblendstocks to petroleum refiners. Fuel. 333. 126233–126233. 10 indexed citations
12.
Young, Ben, et al.. (2021). LCIA Formatter. The Journal of Open Source Software. 6(66). 3392–3392. 7 indexed citations
13.
Lamers, Patrick, et al.. (2021). Potential Socioeconomic and Environmental Effects of an Expanding U.S. Bioeconomy: An Assessment of Near-Commercial Cellulosic Biofuel Pathways. Environmental Science & Technology. 55(8). 5496–5505. 17 indexed citations
14.
Sun, Pingping, Ben Young, Amgad Elgowainy, et al.. (2019). Criteria Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gases Emissions from U.S. Refineries Allocated to Refinery Products. Environmental Science & Technology. 53(11). 6556–6569. 23 indexed citations
15.
Young, Ben, Troy R. Hawkins, Joe Marriott, et al.. (2019). Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of carbon capture for petroleum refining, ammonia production, and thermoelectric power generation in the United States. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 91. 102821–102821. 40 indexed citations
16.
Young, Ben, Troy A. Hottle, Troy R. Hawkins, et al.. (2019). Expansion of the Petroleum Refinery Life Cycle Inventory Model to Support Characterization of a Full Suite of Commonly Tracked Impact Potentials. Environmental Science & Technology. 53(4). 2238–2248. 15 indexed citations
17.
Sun, Pingping, Ben Young, Amgad Elgowainy, et al.. (2019). Criteria Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydrogen Production in U.S. Steam Methane Reforming Facilities. Environmental Science & Technology. 53(12). 7103–7113. 146 indexed citations
18.
Young, Ben, et al.. (2011). Measurement of PM2.5 and ultra-fine particulate emissions from coal-fired utility boilers. Fuel. 108. 60–66. 16 indexed citations
19.
He, Ian, et al.. (2004). Important aspects in source PM2.5 emissions measurement and characterization from stationary combustion systems. Fuel Processing Technology. 85(6-7). 687–699. 8 indexed citations
20.
Douglas, Peter & Ben Young. (1991). Modelling and simulation of an AFBC steam heating plant using ASPEN/SP. Fuel. 70(2). 145–154. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026