Ben W Mol

498 total citations
19 papers, 334 citations indexed

About

Ben W Mol is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben W Mol has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 334 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Ben W Mol's work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers). Ben W Mol is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers). Ben W Mol collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Ben W Mol's co-authors include J.L.H. Evers, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Jolande A. Land, Fulco van der Veen, Martin Offringa, Wes Onland, Anjoke Huisjes, Willem M. Ankum, Douwe J. Hemrika and Hein W. Bruinse and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility and Sterility and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Ben W Mol

16 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ben W Mol Netherlands 10 138 106 82 78 64 19 334
Elena M. Perkins United States 9 96 0.7× 41 0.4× 151 1.8× 86 1.1× 128 2.0× 14 373
Mohamed A. Mohamed United States 11 326 2.4× 86 0.8× 193 2.4× 68 0.9× 56 0.9× 56 489
Nisha Patel United Kingdom 10 223 1.6× 135 1.3× 88 1.1× 62 0.8× 25 0.4× 34 360
Rajlaxmi Mundhra India 9 102 0.7× 68 0.6× 61 0.7× 47 0.6× 42 0.7× 61 249
Jayson Potts Canada 6 212 1.5× 210 2.0× 33 0.4× 63 0.8× 35 0.5× 14 341
Salih Yasin United States 13 259 1.9× 106 1.0× 106 1.3× 172 2.2× 130 2.0× 26 525
David J R Hutchon United Kingdom 13 287 2.1× 138 1.3× 242 3.0× 94 1.2× 107 1.7× 42 521
Maria Andrikopoulou United States 12 261 1.9× 260 2.5× 94 1.1× 113 1.4× 45 0.7× 43 486
Candice Woolfolk United States 13 264 1.9× 367 3.5× 43 0.5× 200 2.6× 180 2.8× 64 621
Juan Carlos Melchor Spain 15 281 2.0× 351 3.3× 107 1.3× 167 2.1× 116 1.8× 49 622

Countries citing papers authored by Ben W Mol

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben W Mol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben W Mol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben W Mol more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben W Mol

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben W Mol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben W Mol. The network helps show where Ben W Mol may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben W Mol

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben W Mol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben W Mol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben W Mol. Ben W Mol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
2.
Bosteels, Jan, et al.. (2024). The trustworthiness of registered randomised control trials on hysteroscopy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 305. 410–415.
3.
Woiski, Mallory, Anneke Dijkman, Nico Schuitemaker, et al.. (2018). Evaluating Adherence to Guideline-Based Quality Indicators for Postpartum Hemorrhage Care in the Netherlands Using Video Analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 132(3). 656–667. 6 indexed citations
4.
Woiski, Mallory, Anneke Dijkman, Richard Grol, et al.. (2016). From Postpartum Haemorrhage Guideline to Local Protocol: A Study of Protocol Quality. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 20(10). 2160–2168. 3 indexed citations
5.
Eckert, Linda O., Beverly Winikoff, Jill Durocher, et al.. (2016). Postpartum haemorrhage: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 34(49). 6102–6109. 20 indexed citations
6.
Hakvoort, Robert A., et al.. (2014). Risk Factors for Postpartum Urinary Retention. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 34(1). 14–14. 4 indexed citations
7.
Connolly, Mark P., et al.. (2013). Costs and benefits of individuals conceived after IVF: a net tax evaluation in The Netherlands. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 28(2). 239–245. 5 indexed citations
8.
Rosman, Ageeth N., et al.. (2013). Contraindications for External Cephalic Version in Breech Position at Term. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 68(6). 418–420.
9.
Rosman, Ageeth N., et al.. (2012). Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 92(2). 137–142. 34 indexed citations
10.
Onland, Wes, et al.. (2010). Effects of Antenatal Corticosteroids Given Prior to 26 Weeks' Gestation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. American Journal of Perinatology. 28(1). 33–44. 38 indexed citations
11.
Houterman, Saskia, et al.. (2010). Reducing errors in health care: cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary team training in obstetric emergencies (TOSTI study); a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 10(1). 59–59. 41 indexed citations
12.
Opmeer, Brent C., Corianne A.J.M. de Borgie, Ben W Mol, & Patrick M. Bossuyt. (2010). Assessing Preferences Regarding Healthcare Interventions that Involve Non-Health Outcomes. Patient. 3(1). 1–10. 12 indexed citations
13.
Kok, Marjolein, et al.. (2008). External Cephalic Version-Related Risks. 3 indexed citations
14.
Mol, Ben W, S.F.P.J. Coppus, Fulco van der Veen, & Patrick M. Bossuyt. (2005). Evaluating Predictors for the Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology: ROC-Curves Are Misleading; Calibration is not!. Fertility and Sterility. 84. S253–S254. 7 indexed citations
15.
Evers, J.L.H., Jolande A. Land, & Ben W Mol. (2003). Evidence-Based Medicine for Diagnostic Questions. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 21(1). 9–16. 32 indexed citations
16.
Mol, Ben W, et al.. (2003). Characteristics of Good Diagnostic Studies. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 21(1). 17–26. 26 indexed citations
17.
Wijnberger, Lia D. E., Anjoke Huisjes, Hieronymus A.M. Voorbij, et al.. (2001). The accuracy of lamellar body count and lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio in the prediction of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a meta‐analysis. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 108(6). 583–588. 38 indexed citations
18.
Wijnberger, Lia D. E., Anjoke Huisjes, Hieronymus A.M. Voorbij, et al.. (2001). The accuracy of lamellar body count and lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio in the prediction of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 108(6). 583–588. 12 indexed citations
19.
Mol, Ben W, Petra J. Hajenius, Simone Engelsbel, et al.. (1999). Treatment of tubal pregnancy in The Netherlands: An economic comparison of systemic methotrexate administration and laparoscopic salpingostomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 181(4). 945–951. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026