Ben Schalet

681 total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

Ben Schalet is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben Schalet has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Ben Schalet's work include Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers). Ben Schalet is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers). Ben Schalet collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Denmark. Ben Schalet's co-authors include Susan Yount, Arthur A. Stone, Seung W. Choi, Dagmar Amtmann, Bryce B. Reeve, Darren A. DeWalt, Richard Gershon, Karon F. Cook, Ron D. Hays and Kevin P. Weinfurt and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, Value in Health and RAND Corporation eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Ben Schalet

10 papers receiving 433 citations

Hit Papers

PROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measu... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ben Schalet United States 3 72 69 68 67 63 10 446
Katie Whale United Kingdom 15 52 0.7× 40 0.6× 52 0.8× 31 0.5× 71 1.1× 36 567
Koravangattu Valsraj United Kingdom 9 62 0.9× 90 1.3× 103 1.5× 61 0.9× 22 0.3× 19 481
Anne‐Mette Hedeager Momsen Denmark 14 112 1.6× 41 0.6× 176 2.6× 52 0.8× 52 0.8× 38 618
Helena Correia United States 9 41 0.6× 56 0.8× 52 0.8× 71 1.1× 38 0.6× 15 324
Jennifer Hanlon United States 10 46 0.6× 64 0.9× 68 1.0× 54 0.8× 25 0.4× 24 854
Jan Sansoni Australia 3 29 0.4× 49 0.7× 128 1.9× 36 0.5× 51 0.8× 4 439
Silvia Paz Spain 11 32 0.4× 91 1.3× 69 1.0× 70 1.0× 82 1.3× 29 555
N. Germain France 7 27 0.4× 80 1.2× 128 1.9× 68 1.0× 63 1.0× 18 641
Victor Heh United States 16 54 0.8× 47 0.7× 67 1.0× 65 1.0× 33 0.5× 42 768
Hildeberto Correia Portugal 8 30 0.4× 69 1.0× 98 1.4× 50 0.7× 19 0.3× 22 467

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Schalet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Schalet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Schalet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Schalet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Schalet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Schalet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Schalet. The network helps show where Ben Schalet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Schalet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Schalet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Schalet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Schalet. Ben Schalet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Edelen, Maria Orlando, Anthony Rodriguez, Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, et al.. (2019). Development and Evaluation of Candidate Standardized Patient Assessment Data Elements: Findings from the National Beta Test (Volume 3: Sample Description). RAND Corporation eBooks. 6 indexed citations
2.
Cella, David, Seung W. Choi, David Condon, et al.. (2019). PROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains. Value in Health. 22(5). 537–544. 424 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Edelen, Maria Orlando, Anthony Rodriguez, Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, et al.. (2019). Development and Evaluation of Candidate Standardized Patient Assessment Data Elements: Findings from the National Beta Test (Volume 4: Cognitive Function). RAND Corporation eBooks. 1 indexed citations
5.
Edelen, Maria Orlando, Anthony Rodriguez, Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, et al.. (2019). Development and Evaluation of Candidate Standardized Patient Assessment Data Elements: Findings from the National Beta Test (Volume 5: Mental Status and Pain). RAND Corporation eBooks. 1 indexed citations
6.
Edelen, Maria Orlando, Anthony Rodriguez, Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, et al.. (2019). Development and Evaluation of Candidate Standardized Patient Assessment Data Elements: Findings from the National Beta Test (Volume 2: Background and Methods). RAND Corporation eBooks. 6 indexed citations
7.
Edelen, Maria Orlando, Anthony Rodriguez, Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, et al.. (2019). Development and Evaluation of Candidate Standardized Patient Assessment Data Elements: Findings from the National Beta Test (Volume 1: Executive Summary). RAND Corporation eBooks. 2 indexed citations
10.
Klokker, Louise, Caroline B. Terwee, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, et al.. (2016). Hand-related physical function in rheumatic hand conditions: a protocol for developing a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument. BMJ Open. 6(12). e011174–e011174. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026