Ben Liao

1.3k citations
10 papers · 678 · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Ben Liao

10 papers receiving 666 citations

Ben Liao's Hit Papers

Could graph neural networks learn better molecular representation for drug discovery? A comparison study of descriptor-based and graph-based models 2021 · 388 citations
3880+1+3Years since publication100200300

Peers

Ben Liao
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 481
  • Materials Chemistry 297
  • Molecular Biology 350
  • Artificial Intelligence 117
  • Biophysics 17
Replace Mingjian Jiang with:
Mingjian Jiang China
Simon Johansson Sweden
Mélaine A. Kuenemann France
Arthur Garon Austria
Thomas Seidel Austria
Nils Weskamp Germany
Kuzma Khrabrov United States
Wen Torng United States
Tianfan Fu United States
Oliver Wieder Austria
Ben Liao relative to Mingjian Jiang China Mingjian Jiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mingjian Jiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Liao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Liao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Liao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Liao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Liao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Liao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Liao. The network helps show where Ben Liao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ben Liao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Liao Line = papers co-authored together Ben Liao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Could graph neural networks learn better molecular representation for drug discovery? A comparison study of descriptor-based and graph-based models
Hit paper breakdown →
2021388
2 2021147
3 202152
4 201940
5 202221
6 202218
7
Locality and Modularity in Abstract Argumentation
20185
8 20223
9 20232
10 20092

About Ben Liao

Ben Liao is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Artificial Intelligence and Organic Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (5 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (1 paper), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (1 paper), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (1 paper), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper) and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (481 citations), Materials Chemistry (297 citations), Molecular Biology (350 citations), Artificial Intelligence (117 citations) and Biophysics (17 citations). Ben Liao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Taiwan and Macao. Frequent co-authors include Chang‐Yu Hsieh, Tingjun Hou, Dongsheng Cao, Dejun Jiang, Zhenhua Wu, Guangyong Chen, Chao Shen, Zhe Wang, Jian Wu and Jike Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Journal of Cheminformatics, Briefings in Bioinformatics and Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact