Barden B. Stagner

2.0k total citations
45 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Barden B. Stagner is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Barden B. Stagner has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Sensory Systems, 38 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 17 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Barden B. Stagner's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (43 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (38 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (17 papers). Barden B. Stagner is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (43 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (38 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (17 papers). Barden B. Stagner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and France. Barden B. Stagner's co-authors include Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin, Glen K. Martin, Martin Whitehead, Frances Harris, Fiona Harris, Alfred C. Coats, Fred F. Telischi, David Jassir, P. F. Fahey and Thomas J. Bałkany and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, The Laryngoscope and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Barden B. Stagner

45 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Barden B. Stagner
Carolina Abdala United States
Leslie D. Liberman United States
Leslie W. Dodds United States
Flint A. Boettcher United States
A. R. Cody Australia
Radha Kalluri United States
Adam C. Furman United States
Burt N. Evans United States
Shawn S. Goodman United States
Carolina Abdala United States
Barden B. Stagner
Citations per year, relative to Barden B. Stagner Barden B. Stagner (= 1×) peers Carolina Abdala

Countries citing papers authored by Barden B. Stagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barden B. Stagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barden B. Stagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barden B. Stagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barden B. Stagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barden B. Stagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barden B. Stagner. The network helps show where Barden B. Stagner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barden B. Stagner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barden B. Stagner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barden B. Stagner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barden B. Stagner. Barden B. Stagner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Luebke, Anne E., Barden B. Stagner, Glen K. Martin, & Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin. (2014). Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 135(4). 1941–1949. 11 indexed citations
2.
Martin, Glen K., Barden B. Stagner, & Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin. (2013). Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 134(1). 342–355. 14 indexed citations
3.
McFadden, Dennis, et al.. (2009). Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 125(1). 239–246. 48 indexed citations
4.
Bektaş, Devrim, Glen K. Martin, Barden B. Stagner, & Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin. (2008). Noise-induced hearing loss in mice treated with antiretroviral drugs. Hearing Research. 239(1-2). 69–78. 12 indexed citations
5.
Martin, Glen K., et al.. (2007). Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in 28 inbred strains of mice. Hearing Research. 234(1-2). 59–72. 19 indexed citations
6.
Martin, Glen K., et al.. (2006). Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in normal and noise-exposed rabbits. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 120(2). 884–900. 6 indexed citations
7.
Meinke, Deanna K., Barden B. Stagner, Glen K. Martin, & Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin. (2005). Human efferent adaptation of DPOAEs in the L1,L2 space. Hearing Research. 208(1-2). 89–100. 14 indexed citations
8.
Benson, Janet M., Barden B. Stagner, Glen K. Martin, et al.. (2005). Cochlear function in mice following inhalation of brevetoxin-3. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 191(7). 619–626. 1 indexed citations
9.
Martin, Glen K., et al.. (2004). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions show exceptional resistance to noise exposure in MOLF/Ei mice. Hearing Research. 194(1-2). 109–117. 17 indexed citations
10.
Martin, Glen K., et al.. (2003). Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f2. II. Findings in humans. Hearing Research. 177(1-2). 111–122. 16 indexed citations
11.
Luebke, Anne E., et al.. (2002). A Multifrequency Method for Determining Cochlear Efferent Activity. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 3(1). 16–25. 12 indexed citations
12.
Stagner, Barden B., et al.. (2001). Susceptibility of DPOAEs to Sound Overexposure in Inbred Mice with AHL. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2(3). 233–245. 21 indexed citations
13.
Stagner, Barden B., et al.. (1999). Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f2. I. Basic findings in rabbits. Hearing Research. 136(1-2). 105–123. 48 indexed citations
14.
Stagner, Barden B., et al.. (1999). Age-related loss of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in four mouse strains. Hearing Research. 138(1-2). 91–105. 63 indexed citations
15.
Telischi, Fred F., T. Mom, Barden B. Stagner, et al.. (1999). Comparison of the Auditory‐Evoked Brainstem Response Wave I to Distortion‐Product Otoacoustic Emissions Resulting From Changes to Inner Ear Blood Flow. The Laryngoscope. 109(2). 186–191. 18 indexed citations
16.
Telischi, Fred F., et al.. (1998). Distortion‐Product Otoacoustic Emission Monitoring of Cochlear Blood Flow. The Laryngoscope. 108(6). 837–842. 20 indexed citations
17.
Whitehead, Martin, Barden B. Stagner, Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin, & Glen K. Martin. (1995). Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 98(6). 3200–3214. 49 indexed citations
18.
Whitehead, Martin, Barden B. Stagner, Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin, & Glen K. Martin. (1994). Measurement of otoacoustic emissions for hearing assessment. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. 13(2). 210–226. 39 indexed citations
19.
Franklin, Daniel J., Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin, Barden B. Stagner, & Glen K. Martin. (1991). Altered susceptibility of 2f1—f2 acoustic-distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hearing Research. 53(2). 185–208. 55 indexed citations
20.
Stagner, Barden B., et al.. (1990). Postnatal development of 2ƒ1−ƒ2 otoacoustic emissions in pigmented rat. Hearing Research. 43(2-3). 141–148. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026