Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Friedl
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Friedl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Friedl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Friedl more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Friedl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Friedl. The network helps show where Barbara Friedl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Friedl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Friedl.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Friedl based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Friedl. Barbara Friedl is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Prasicek, Günther, et al.. (2018). Detection of Landslide-induced River Course Changes and Lake Formation on Remote Sensing Data. AGUFM. 2018.
3.
Prasicek, Günther, et al.. (2018). Detection and analysis of River course changes and lake formation - The RiCoLa Project. EGUGA. 7768.1 indexed citations
4.
Friedl, Barbara, et al.. (2018). Detection of landslide-dammed lakes and triggering landslides in Taiwan using Landsat imagery. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 14915.
5.
Prasicek, Günther, et al.. (2018). Detecting landslide-induced paleolakes and their impact on river course. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 6349.1 indexed citations
Hölbling, Daniel, et al.. (2016). EO-based landslide mapping: from methodological developments to automated web-based information delivery. 102–103.1 indexed citations
10.
Friedl, Barbara, Daniel Hölbling, Clemens Eisank, & Thomas Blaschke. (2015). Object-based landslide detection in different geographic regions. EGUGA. 774.1 indexed citations
11.
Hölbling, Daniel, Barbara Friedl, Clemens Eisank, & Thomas Blaschke. (2015). Object-based landslide mapping on satellite images from different sensors. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 511.1 indexed citations
Plank, Simon, Daniel Hölbling, Clemens Eisank, et al.. (2015). Comparing object-based landslide detection methods based on polarimetric SAR and optical satellite imagery - a case study in Taiwan. elib (German Aerospace Center). 729. 59.11 indexed citations
15.
Hölbling, Daniel, Barbara Friedl, & Clemens Eisank. (2014). Object-based change detection for landslide monitoring based on SPOT imagery. EGUGA. 10634.1 indexed citations
16.
Vanhuysse, Sabine, et al.. (2014). Object‐Based image analysis for detecting indicators of mine presence to support suspected hazardous area re‐delineation. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 3(2). 525–529.1 indexed citations
17.
Eisank, Clemens, et al.. (2014). Expert knowledge for object-based landslide mapping in Taiwan. 347–350.15 indexed citations
18.
Hölbling, Daniel, et al.. (2014). Pixel-based and object-based landslide mapping: a methodological comparison.1 indexed citations
19.
Hölbling, Daniel, et al.. (2014). An object-based method for mapping landslides on various optical satellite imagery - transferability and applicability across spatial resolutions.1 indexed citations
20.
Friedl, Barbara, Daniel Hölbling, & Petra Füreder. (2012). Combining TerraSAR-X and SPOT-5 data for object-based landslide detection.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.