B. Pound

601 total citations
21 papers, 388 citations indexed

About

B. Pound is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Business and International Management. According to data from OpenAlex, B. Pound has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 388 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in Business and International Management. Recurrent topics in B. Pound's work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (3 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (2 papers). B. Pound is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (3 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (2 papers). B. Pound collaborates with scholars based in Zimbabwe, Afghanistan and United Kingdom. B. Pound's co-authors include Sieglinde S. Snapp, Cynthia McDougall, Ann R. Braun, Héléna Posthumus, Nadine Andrieu, Bernard Triomphe, Florence Mtambanengwe, Marc Corbeels, Krishna Naudin and G.E. van Halsema and has published in prestigious journals such as Field Crops Research, Mountain Research and Development and Journal of Peacebuilding & Development.

In The Last Decade

B. Pound

18 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
B. Pound Zimbabwe 6 158 93 88 74 56 21 388
Gerard E. D’Souza United States 12 169 1.1× 131 1.4× 40 0.5× 52 0.7× 39 0.7× 29 443
Glenn Denning United States 7 274 1.7× 115 1.2× 115 1.3× 137 1.9× 68 1.2× 16 606
Joachim Aurbacher Germany 11 100 0.6× 102 1.1× 112 1.3× 87 1.2× 74 1.3× 28 347
Bridget Bwalya Umar Zambia 12 181 1.1× 43 0.5× 72 0.8× 112 1.5× 63 1.1× 37 382
Anne-Marie Izac United States 5 208 1.3× 128 1.4× 75 0.9× 72 1.0× 160 2.9× 5 573
Dominique Endamana Cameroon 9 185 1.2× 54 0.6× 130 1.5× 61 0.8× 188 3.4× 19 481
Franz Sinabell Austria 13 163 1.0× 47 0.5× 47 0.5× 74 1.0× 80 1.4× 68 467
Evans Dawoe Ghana 16 166 1.1× 157 1.7× 108 1.2× 127 1.7× 111 2.0× 32 688
G.A.A. Wossink Netherlands 13 291 1.8× 139 1.5× 70 0.8× 81 1.1× 100 1.8× 40 719
Rosaine N. Yegbemey Benin 13 195 1.2× 70 0.8× 252 2.9× 134 1.8× 54 1.0× 42 568

Countries citing papers authored by B. Pound

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Pound's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Pound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Pound more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Pound

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Pound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Pound. The network helps show where B. Pound may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Pound

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Pound. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Pound based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Pound. B. Pound is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pound, B. & Héléna Posthumus. (2016). The merits and limitations of innovation platforms for promoting Conservation Agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa.. 1–10. 2 indexed citations
2.
Paterson, Ted A., et al.. (2013). Landmines and Livelihoods in Afghanistan: Evaluating the Benefits of Mine Action. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development. 8(2). 73–90. 4 indexed citations
3.
Tittonell, Pablo, Éric Scopel, Nadine Andrieu, et al.. (2012). Agroecology-based aggradation-conservation agriculture (ABACO): Targeting innovations to combat soil degradation and food insecurity in semi-arid Africa. Field Crops Research. 132. 168–174. 131 indexed citations
4.
Tittonell, Pablo, Éric Scopel, Gerardo van Halsema, et al.. (2011). Agroecology-based aggradation-conservation agriculture (ABACO): targeting resource-limited and degraded environments of semi-arid Africa. Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich). 2 indexed citations
5.
Posthumus, Héléna, B. Pound, Nadine Andrieu, & Bernard Triomphe. (2011). Enhancing adoption of conservation agriculture practices through co-innovation platforms in sub-Saharan Africa. Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich). 2 indexed citations
6.
Martin, Adrienne, et al.. (2011). Review of literature on evaluation methods relevant to extension. Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich). 3 indexed citations
7.
Pound, B., et al.. (2011). Making ARD more pro-poor; improving accessibility and relevance of results to the poorest. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1 indexed citations
8.
Snapp, Sieglinde S. & B. Pound. (2008). Agricultural systems : agroecology and rural innovation for development. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 76 indexed citations
9.
Pound, B., et al.. (2007). Innovation partnerships for effective adaptive research and technology uptake. Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich). 1 indexed citations
10.
Pound, B., et al.. (2004). Piloting an adaptive research process to address farmer’s information gaps. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 9(1). 137–144.
11.
Pound, B., Sieglinde S. Snapp, Cynthia McDougall, & Ann R. Braun. (2003). Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 111 indexed citations
12.
Pound, B., et al.. (2000). Sustainable agriculture on the forest margin. 16(3). 24–25. 1 indexed citations
13.
Pound, B., et al.. (1999). SPECIES FOR NICHES: WHEN AND FOR WHOM ARE COVER CROPS APPROPRIATE?. Mountain Research and Development. 19(4). 307–312. 1 indexed citations
14.
Pound, B.. (1999). The appropriate use of qualitative information in participatory research and development. What are the issues for farmers and researchers. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).
15.
Joshi, K.D., et al.. (1996). Experience of soil fertility issues from Jhikhu Khola, a middle mountain watershed in Nepal.. 109–113. 3 indexed citations
16.
Pound, B., et al.. (1983). Leucaena: its cultivation and uses.. 22 indexed citations
17.
Pound, B., et al.. (1981). Biogas production from mixtures of cattle slurry and pressed sugar cane stalk, with and without urea.. 6(1). 11–21. 13 indexed citations
18.
Pound, B., et al.. (1980). The establishment of Leucaena leucocephala with associated crops.. 5(1). 1 indexed citations
19.
Pound, B., et al.. (1980). The production of biogas from cattle slurry: the effects of concentration of total solids and animal diet.. 130–135. 9 indexed citations
20.
Pound, B., et al.. (1980). Effect of companion crops in the establishment and subsequent yield of Leucaena leucocephala.. 5(3). 228–231. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026