Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cell proliferation and migration as revealed by radioautography after injection of thymidine‐H3 into male rats and mice
1960666 citationsB. Messier, C. P. LeblondAmerican Journal of Anatomyprofile →
Renewal of chief cells and goblet cells in the small intestine as shown by radioautography after injection of thymidine‐H3 into mice
1958306 citationsC. P. Leblond, B. MessierThe Anatomical Recordprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Messier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Messier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Messier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Messier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Messier. The network helps show where B. Messier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Messier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Messier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Messier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Messier. B. Messier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cp, Leblond, B. Messier, & Beatrix Markus Kopriwa. (2000). Thymidine-H3 as a tool for the investigation of the renewal of cell populations.. PubMed. 8(1). 296–306; discussion 306.11 indexed citations
2.
Larbrisseau, Albert, P Jean, B. Messier, & C.-L. Richer. (1982). Fragile X chromosome and X-linked mental retardation.. PubMed. 127(2). 123–6.11 indexed citations
3.
Sainte-Marie, G & B. Messier. (1972). Labelling of lymphoid organs by intravenous injection of large doses of 3 H-thymidine.. PubMed. 17(9). 839–46.1 indexed citations
4.
Messier, B., et al.. (1971). Histological changes in the gastric mucosa of magnesium deficient rats.. PubMed. 52(1). 70–4.3 indexed citations
Sainte-Marie, G & B. Messier. (1969). Labelling of the rat thymus by intramediastinal injection of tritiated thymidine.. PubMed. 28(3). 205–8.2 indexed citations
Messier, B.. (1966). Action of thyroid hormones and diethylstilbestrol on the gonadotropic activity of a mouse thyrotropic tumor.. PubMed. 26(3). 479–82.2 indexed citations
Messier, B. & C. P. Leblond. (1960). Cell proliferation and migration as revealed by radioautography after injection of thymidine‐H3 into male rats and mice. American Journal of Anatomy. 106(3). 247–285.666 indexed citations breakdown →
Clermont, Y., Leblond Cp, & B. Messier. (1959). [Duration of the cycle of the seminal epithelium of the rat].. PubMed. 48(Suppl). 37–55.35 indexed citations
Leblond, C. P. & B. Messier. (1958). Renewal of chief cells and goblet cells in the small intestine as shown by radioautography after injection of thymidine‐H3 into mice. The Anatomical Record. 132(3). 247–259.306 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.