Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The SOHO mission: An overview
1995961 citationsV. Domingo, B. Fleck et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Fleck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Fleck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Fleck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Fleck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Fleck. The network helps show where B. Fleck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Fleck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Fleck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Fleck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Fleck. B. Fleck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mueller, Daniel, et al.. (2013). JHelioviewer: Visualization software for solar physics data. ascl.1 indexed citations
7.
Fleck, B., T. Straus, S. M. Jefferies, & P. H. Scherrer. (2010). Estimating the Energy Flux of Acoustic-Gravity Waves in the Solar Atmosphere from SDO/HMI Data. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2010.1 indexed citations
8.
Mueller, Daniel, et al.. (2010). The Helioviewer Project: Browsing, Visualizing and Accessing Petabytes of Solar Data. AAS. 216.
9.
Hughitt, V. Keith, et al.. (2009). Helioviewer.org: Browsing Very Large Image Archives Online Using JPEG 2000. AGUFM. 2009.1 indexed citations
10.
Hughitt, V. Keith, et al.. (2008). Helioviewer: A Web 2.0 Tool for Visualizing Heterogeneous Heliophysics Data. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008.2 indexed citations
11.
Straus, T., et al.. (2008). On the Role of Acoustic-Gravity Waves in the Energetics of the Solar Atmosphere. 12. 95–100.3 indexed citations
12.
Fleck, B., et al.. (2006). 10 Years of soho. 126(126). 24–32.4 indexed citations
13.
Jefferies, S. M., Scott W. McIntosh, J. D. Armstrong, et al.. (2006). Low-frequency magneto-acoustic waves in the solar chromosphere. 26. 16.1 indexed citations
14.
Fleck, B., et al.. (2005). Connecting Sun and Heliosphere (Solar Wind 11 / SOHO 16). ESASP. 592.3 indexed citations
15.
McIntosh, Scott W. & B. Fleck. (2004). Spatial Correlations of Phase Relationships in TRACE Ultraviolet Bandpasses. 219. 696.
Fleck, B., P. Brekke, S. V. H. Haugan, et al.. (2000). Four years of SOHO discoveries - some highlights.. 102. 68–86.
18.
Fleck, B., E. Marsch, R. Schwenn, et al.. (2000). Solar Orbiter --- A High Resolution Mission to the Sun and Inner Heliosphere. 31.3 indexed citations
19.
Fleck, B., et al.. (1994). On the propagation of linear 3-D hydrodynamic waves in plane non-isothermal atmospheres. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 106(1). 129–139.2 indexed citations
20.
Fleck, B. & A D Toft. (1990). Graves' ophthalmopathy.. BMJ. 300(6736). 1352–1353.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.