Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A review of biomass-derived heterogeneous catalyst for a sustainable biodiesel production
2016372 citationsAzman Azid, Roslan Umar et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Azman Azid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Azman Azid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Azman Azid more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Azman Azid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Azman Azid. The network helps show where Azman Azid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Azman Azid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Azman Azid.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Azman Azid based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Azman Azid. Azman Azid is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Azid, Azman, Mohd Saiful Samsudin, Muhammad Barzani Gasim, et al.. (2018). Air quality modelling using chemometric techniques. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 9(2S). 443–443.5 indexed citations
Azid, Azman, et al.. (2018). Prediction model of missing data: a case study of PM 10 across Malaysia Region. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 10. 182–203.2 indexed citations
Hamzah, Noraini, et al.. (2018). Generic skills requirements (KSA model) towards future mechanical engineers using discriminant analysis. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 10. 169–181.
Yusof, Ku Mohd Kalkausar Ku, et al.. (2018). Determination of significant variables to particulate matter (PM 10 ) variations in northern region, Malaysia during haze episodes (2006-2015). Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 10. 300–312.3 indexed citations
13.
Kamarudin, Mohd Khairul Amri, Mohd Ekhwan Toriman, Mushrifah Idris, et al.. (2016). Environmental Management on Natural Lake Using Sediment and Hydrology Hydraulic Models. 1(2). 9–26.4 indexed citations
14.
Azid, Azman, et al.. (2015). Pemodelan ruang kualiti udara menggunakan teknik-teknik kemometrik: Satu kajian kes di semenanjung Malaysia. 19(6). 1415–1430.1 indexed citations
15.
Juahir, Hafizan, et al.. (2015). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques in the Terengganu river basin.. 19(2). 338–348.10 indexed citations
16.
Isiyaka, Hamza Ahmad & Azman Azid. (2015). Air Quality Pattern Assessment in Malaysia Using Multivariate Techniques. 19(5). 966–978.23 indexed citations
17.
Azid, Azman, et al.. (2015). GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) FOR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENGUE DISEASE AND CLIMATIC FACTORS AT CHERAS, MALAYSIA. 19(6). 1318–1326.7 indexed citations
18.
Juahir, Hafizan, et al.. (2015). Application of Excel-VBA for Computation of Water Quality Index and Air Pollutant Index. 19(5). 1056–1064.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.