Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Does the Internet Make Markets More Competitive? Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry
Countries citing papers authored by Austan Goolsbee
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Austan Goolsbee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Austan Goolsbee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Austan Goolsbee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Austan Goolsbee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Austan Goolsbee. The network helps show where Austan Goolsbee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Austan Goolsbee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Austan Goolsbee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Austan Goolsbee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Austan Goolsbee. Austan Goolsbee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goolsbee, Austan & Chad Syverson. (2020). Fear, lockdown, and diversion: Comparing drivers of pandemic economic decline 2020. Journal of Public Economics. 193. 104311–104311.456 indexed citations breakdown →
Goolsbee, Austan & Chad Syverson. (2019). Monopsony Power in Higher Education: A Tale of Two Tracks. NBER Working Paper No. 26070.. National Bureau of Economic Research.2 indexed citations
Goolsbee, Austan & Jonathan Guryan. (2006). World Wide Wonder? Measuring the (Non-)Impact of Internet Subsidies to Public Schools. Education next. 6(1). 60–65.2 indexed citations
10.
Chevalier, Judith A. & Austan Goolsbee. (2003). Valuing Internet Retailers: Amazon and Barnes and Noble. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
11.
Goolsbee, Austan & Judith A. Chevalier. (2002). Measuring Prices and Price Competition Online: Amazon and Barnes and Noble. National Bureau of Economic Research.3 indexed citations
12.
Goolsbee, Austan. (2002). The Impact and Inefficiency of the Corporate Income Tax: Evidence from State Organizational Form Data. National Bureau of Economic Research.5 indexed citations
Goolsbee, Austan. (1998). Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers?. American Economic Review. 88(2). 298–302.206 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.