Assessment Programme

754 total citations
11 papers, 559 citations indexed

About

Assessment Programme is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Assessment Programme has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 559 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Assessment Programme's work include Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (3 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers). Assessment Programme is often cited by papers focused on Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (3 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers). Assessment Programme collaborates with scholars based in . Assessment Programme's co-authors include Arctic Monitoring, Helgi Jensson and Kristín Ólafsdóttir and has published in prestigious journals such as .

In The Last Decade

Assessment Programme

11 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Assessment Programme	8	242	219	122	104	69	11	559
Arctic Monitoring	8	241 1.0×	167 0.8×	113 0.9×	101 1.0×	68 1.0×	10	506
Nicole M. Herman‐Mercer United States	7	245 1.0×	166 0.8×	94 0.8×	65 0.6×	49 0.7×	16	507
Lars-Otto Reiersen Norway	10	202 0.8×	175 0.8×	89 0.7×	87 0.8×	83 1.2×	17	497
В. А. Безносиков Russia	15	173 0.7×	138 0.6×	138 1.1×	105 1.0×	38 0.6×	48	515
Edda Mutter United States	8	185 0.8×	60 0.3×	90 0.7×	67 0.6×	58 0.8×	11	427
Monika Pućko Canada	14	302 1.2×	426 1.9×	118 1.0×	120 1.2×	155 2.2×	20	650
Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme	7	200 0.8×	386 1.8×	183 1.5×	168 1.6×	105 1.5×	16	737
Gwyneth A. MacMillan Canada	10	405 1.7×	258 1.2×	181 1.5×	82 0.8×	131 1.9×	15	867
Б. М. Кондратенок Russia	14	150 0.6×	139 0.6×	102 0.8×	86 0.8×	37 0.5×	41	528
Alice Grgicak‐Mannion Canada	13	190 0.8×	367 1.7×	132 1.1×	75 0.7×	16 0.2×	24	566

Countries citing papers authored by Assessment Programme

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Assessment Programme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assessment Programme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessment Programme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Assessment Programme

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Assessment Programme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Assessment Programme. The network helps show where Assessment Programme may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Assessment Programme

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Assessment Programme. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Assessment Programme based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Assessment Programme. Assessment Programme is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Monitoring, Arctic & Assessment Programme. (2019). Technical Background Report to the Global Mercury Assessment 2018 [Pre-print]. 1 indexed citations

2.

Monitoring, Arctic, et al.. (2016). The Arctic Freshwater System in a Changing Climate. 10 indexed citations

3.

Monitoring, Arctic & Assessment Programme. (2015). AMAP Assessment 2015: Methane as an Arctic climate forcer.. 30 indexed citations

4.

Monitoring, Arctic & Assessment Programme. (2015). Global Mercury Modelling: Update of Modelling Results in the Global Mercury Assessment 2013. 7 indexed citations

5.

Programme, Assessment. (2013). Technical background report to the Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment - 2013. 53 indexed citations

6.

Monitoring, Arctic & Assessment Programme. (2013). Technical Background Report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2013. 30 indexed citations

7.

Monitoring, Arctic & Assessment Programme. (2013). Identification of Arctic marine areas of heightened ecological and cultural significance: Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment (AMSA) IIc. 18 indexed citations

8.

Monitoring, Arctic & Assessment Programme. (2012). Arctic Climate Issues 2011: Changes in Arctic Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost. SWIPA 2011 Overview Report.. 191 indexed citations

9.

Monitoring, Arctic & Assessment Programme. (2011). Arctic Pollution 2011 (Mercury).. 2 indexed citations

10.

Jensson, Helgi, Kristín Ólafsdóttir, Arctic Monitoring, & Assessment Programme. (2009). AMAP assessment 2009 : human health in the Arctic. 61 indexed citations

11.

Monitoring, Arctic, et al.. (2008). Final Report of the Workshop on Adaptation of Climate Scenarios to Arctic Climate Impact Assessments, Oslo, May 14-16, 2007. AMAP Report 2007:4.. 156 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact