Arthur E. Woodhead
About
In The Last Decade
Arthur E. Woodhead
4 papers receiving 12 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref
| Name | h | Career | Trend | Papers | Cites | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur E. Woodhead | 3 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | ||
| Nelson J. Wade United States | 3 | 19 1.7× | 5 1.7× | 5 | 35 | |||||
| Richard J. Pedersen United States | 3 | 21 1.9× | 5 0.8× | 4 | 27 | |||||
| Edwin B. Bartram | 5 | 14 1.3× | 3 1.0× | 16 | 50 | |||||
| Marie V. Lebour United Kingdom | 2 | 5 0.5× | 2 0.7× | 4 | 6 | |||||
| R. Childers United States | 3 | 17 1.5× | 2 0.7× | 4 | 37 | |||||
| Henry K. Svenson United States | 3 | 8 0.7× | 2 0.7× | 7 | 20 | |||||
| E. R. Kalmbach | 3 | 6 0.5× | 9 | 21 | ||||||
| J.E. Gray United States | 4 | 10 0.9× | 2 0.3× | 12 4.0× | 1 0.3× | 5 | 32 | |||
| A. Brazier Howell | 2 | 6 0.5× | 1 0.3× | 2 | 12 | |||||
| W. J. Elford Tanzania | 2 | 8 0.7× | 2 | 16 |
Countries citing papers authored by Arthur E. Woodhead
This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur E. Woodhead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur E. Woodhead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur E. Woodhead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur E. Woodhead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur E. Woodhead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur E. Woodhead. The network helps show where Arthur E. Woodhead may publish in the future.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.