Aradhana Vipra

449 total citations
10 papers, 361 citations indexed

About

Aradhana Vipra is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Ecology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Aradhana Vipra has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 361 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Infectious Diseases, 6 papers in Ecology and 5 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Aradhana Vipra's work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (6 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (4 papers). Aradhana Vipra is often cited by papers focused on Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (6 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (4 papers). Aradhana Vipra collaborates with scholars based in India, Canada and Portugal. Aradhana Vipra's co-authors include Umender Sharma, Sandhya K. Nair, Bharathi Sriram, Raghu Patil Junjappa, Juliet Roshini Mohan Raj, Sriram Padmanabhan, Polly Roy, Sriram Padmanabhan, Shilpa Elizabeth George and Ponminor Senthil Kumar and has published in prestigious journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Microbiology and Drug Discovery Today.

In The Last Decade

Aradhana Vipra

10 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Aradhana Vipra India 10 209 154 115 79 47 10 361
Fatma Abdelrahman Egypt 8 279 1.3× 173 1.1× 105 0.9× 57 0.7× 48 1.0× 20 416
Callum Cooper Sweden 11 276 1.3× 140 0.9× 126 1.1× 96 1.2× 27 0.6× 14 387
Pengjuan Gong China 9 301 1.4× 181 1.2× 162 1.4× 61 0.8× 42 0.9× 9 421
Romuald Gryko Poland 10 315 1.5× 211 1.4× 192 1.7× 61 0.8× 60 1.3× 18 435
Guangmou Yan China 11 312 1.5× 173 1.1× 105 0.9× 55 0.7× 50 1.1× 17 413
Jessica Sacher Canada 12 362 1.7× 169 1.1× 127 1.1× 78 1.0× 65 1.4× 20 454
Lidia Mizak Poland 8 278 1.3× 176 1.1× 156 1.4× 42 0.5× 42 0.9× 12 362
Hengyu Xi China 12 273 1.3× 167 1.1× 127 1.1× 49 0.6× 29 0.6× 20 353
Sylwia Parasion Poland 7 361 1.7× 190 1.2× 203 1.8× 74 0.9× 38 0.8× 7 417
Bharathi Sriram India 10 256 1.2× 141 0.9× 131 1.1× 87 1.1× 41 0.9× 13 352

Countries citing papers authored by Aradhana Vipra

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aradhana Vipra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aradhana Vipra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aradhana Vipra more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aradhana Vipra

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aradhana Vipra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aradhana Vipra. The network helps show where Aradhana Vipra may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aradhana Vipra

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aradhana Vipra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aradhana Vipra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aradhana Vipra. Aradhana Vipra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Sharma, Umender, et al.. (2018). Phage-derived lysins as potential agents for eradicating biofilms and persisters. Drug Discovery Today. 23(4). 848–856. 80 indexed citations
2.
Nair, Sandhya K., et al.. (2018). Restoration of sensitivity of a diverse set of drug-resistant Staphylococcus clinical strains by bactericidal protein P128. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 67(3). 296–307. 12 indexed citations
3.
Nair, Sandhya K., et al.. (2017). Efficient Killing of Planktonic and Biofilm-Embedded Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci by Bactericidal Protein P128. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 61(8). 37 indexed citations
4.
Nair, Sandhya K., et al.. (2016). Antibiofilm Activity and Synergistic Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms by Bactericidal Protein P128 in Combination with Antibiotics. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 60(12). 7280–7289. 72 indexed citations
5.
Roy, Polly, et al.. (2014). Simulated hatchery system to assess bacteriophage efficacy against Vibrio harveyi. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 112(2). 113–119. 25 indexed citations
6.
Vipra, Aradhana, et al.. (2014). Bacteriophage-derived CHAP domain protein, P128, kills Staphylococcus cells by cleaving interpeptide cross-bridge of peptidoglycan. Microbiology. 160(10). 2157–2169. 21 indexed citations
7.
Junjappa, Raghu Patil, et al.. (2013). Efficacy of anti-staphylococcal protein P128 for the treatment of canine pyoderma: potential applications. Veterinary Research Communications. 37(3). 217–228. 15 indexed citations
8.
George, Shilpa Elizabeth, et al.. (2013). Therapeutic Potential of Staphylococcal Bacteriophages for Nasal Decolonization of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in Mice. Advances in Microbiology. 3(1). 52–60. 9 indexed citations
9.
Vipra, Aradhana, et al.. (2013). Determining the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Bacteriophages: Potential Advantages. Advances in Microbiology. 3(2). 181–190. 44 indexed citations
10.
Vipra, Aradhana, et al.. (2012). Antistaphylococcal activity of bacteriophage derived chimeric protein P128. BMC Microbiology. 12(1). 41–41. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026