Anthony T. Ruys

913 total citations
20 papers, 669 citations indexed

About

Anthony T. Ruys is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anthony T. Ruys has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 669 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Surgery, 13 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 10 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Anthony T. Ruys's work include Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (14 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (10 papers) and Viral-associated cancers and disorders (5 papers). Anthony T. Ruys is often cited by papers focused on Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (14 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (10 papers) and Viral-associated cancers and disorders (5 papers). Anthony T. Ruys collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Italy. Anthony T. Ruys's co-authors include Thomas M. van Gulik, Olivier R. Busch, Dirk J. Gouma, Erik A. Rauws, Dirk J. Gouma, Marc Engelbrecht, Jaap Stoker, Shandra Bipat, Jimme K. Wiggers and Bas Groot Koerkamp and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Annals of Surgical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Anthony T. Ruys

20 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers

Anthony T. Ruys
Kwang Yeol Paik South Korea
Dong Do You South Korea
Won Ki Kang South Korea
Yejong Park South Korea
Anthony T. Ruys
Citations per year, relative to Anthony T. Ruys Anthony T. Ruys (= 1×) peers Hiroya Saito

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony T. Ruys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony T. Ruys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony T. Ruys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony T. Ruys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony T. Ruys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony T. Ruys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony T. Ruys. The network helps show where Anthony T. Ruys may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony T. Ruys

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony T. Ruys. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony T. Ruys based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony T. Ruys. Anthony T. Ruys is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ruys, Anthony T., et al.. (2022). A nationwide survey on the perceptions of general surgeons on artificial intelligence. 10 indexed citations
2.
Veen, Ruben N. van, et al.. (2020). Feasibility of Postoperative Home Monitoring Using Video Consultation and Vital Sign Monitoring of Bariatric Patients. Obesity Surgery. 30(6). 2369–2374. 13 indexed citations
3.
Vries, Claire E. E. de, Christel A.L. de Raaff, Anthony T. Ruys, et al.. (2018). Validity of a simple sleep monitor for diagnosing OSA in bariatric surgery patients. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 14(7). 1020–1025. 6 indexed citations
4.
Coelen, Robert J.S., Anthony T. Ruys, Jimme K. Wiggers, et al.. (2016). Development of a Risk Score to Predict Detection of Metastasized or Locally Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma at Staging Laparoscopy. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 23(S5). 904–910. 17 indexed citations
5.
Coelen, Robert J.S., Anthony T. Ruys, Marc G. Besselink, Olivier R. Busch, & Thomas M. van Gulik. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 30(10). 4163–4173. 21 indexed citations
6.
Wiggers, Jimme K., Anthony T. Ruys, Bas Groot Koerkamp, et al.. (2014). Differences in immunohistochemical biomarkers between intra‐ and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 29(8). 1582–1594. 35 indexed citations
7.
Ruys, Anthony T., et al.. (2013). Delay in surgical treatment of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does time impact outcomes?. HPB. 16(5). 469–474. 5 indexed citations
8.
Ruys, Anthony T., Bas Groot Koerkamp, Jimme K. Wiggers, et al.. (2013). Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Resected Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 21(2). 487–500. 48 indexed citations
9.
Ruys, Anthony T., Olivier R. Busch, Erik A. Rauws, Dirk J. Gouma, & Thomas M. van Gulik. (2013). Prognostic Impact of Preoperative Imaging Parameters on Resectability of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. HPB Surgery. 2013. 1–6. 26 indexed citations
10.
Ruys, Anthony T., et al.. (2012). Radiological staging in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Radiology. 85(1017). 1255–1262. 111 indexed citations
11.
Ruys, Anthony T., Olivier R. Busch, Dirk J. Gouma, & Thomas M. van Gulik. (2012). Staging Laparoscopy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Is it Still Worthwhile?. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology. 3(2). 147–153. 11 indexed citations
12.
Hoekstra, Lisette T., Anthony T. Ruys, Dan M.J. Milstein, et al.. (2012). Effects of Prolonged Pneumoperitoneum on Hepatic Perfusion During Laparoscopy. Annals of Surgery. 257(2). 302–307. 15 indexed citations
13.
Ruys, Anthony T., et al.. (2012). Long‐term Survival in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma also Possible in Unresectable Patients. World Journal of Surgery. 36(9). 2179–2186. 46 indexed citations
14.
Ruys, Anthony T., Fiebo J.W. ten Kate, Olivier R. Busch, et al.. (2011). Metastatic lymph nodes in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does size matter?. HPB. 13(12). 881–886. 25 indexed citations
15.
Ruys, Anthony T., Pieter J. Tanis, Irıs D. Nagtegaal, et al.. (2011). Surgical Treatment of Renal Cell Cancer Liver Metastases: A Population-Based Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 18(7). 1932–1938. 56 indexed citations
16.
Ruys, Anthony T., Olivier R. Busch, Dirk J. Gouma, & Thomas M. van Gulik. (2011). Staging Laparoscopy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Is it Still Worthwhile?. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 18(9). 2647–2653. 54 indexed citations
17.
Gulik, Thomas M. van, Anthony T. Ruys, O.R. Busch, Erik A. Rauws, & Dirk J. Gouma. (2011). Extent of Liver Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin Tumor): How Much Is Enough?. Digestive Surgery. 28(2). 141–147. 36 indexed citations
18.
Ruys, Anthony T., Roel J. Bennink, Henderik L. van Westreenen, et al.. (2011). FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and standardized uptake value in the primary diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB. 13(4). 256–262. 35 indexed citations
19.
Kloek, Jaap J., Anthony T. Ruys, Olivier R. Busch, et al.. (2010). Multidisciplinary management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor): Extended resection is associated with improved survival. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 37(1). 65–71. 73 indexed citations
20.
Ruys, Anthony T., et al.. (2010). Jejunal Cancer in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 8(8). 731–733. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026