Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A survey of indoor positioning systems for wireless personal networks
20091.1k citationsYanying Gu, Anthony Lo et al.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorialsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Lo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Lo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Lo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Lo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Lo. The network helps show where Anthony Lo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony Lo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony Lo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony Lo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony Lo. Anthony Lo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Qing, et al.. (2015). Performance analysis of large centralized and distributed MU-MIMO systems in indoor WLAN. TU/e Research Portal. 38(9). 1–6.
Lo, Anthony, et al.. (2013). Using a DTA model to evaluate road tolling strategies: Seattle Experience. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.2 indexed citations
Sarijari, Mohd Adib, Anthony Lo, Rozeha A. Rashid, & Norsheila Fisal. (2012). Interference issues in Smart Grid Home Area Network to enable Demand Response and Advanced Metering Infrastructure: survey and solutions. 1(1). 59–71.1 indexed citations
9.
Lo, Anthony, et al.. (2012). ns-2 models for simulating a novel beyond 3G cellular multi-hop network.1 indexed citations
10.
Gu, Yanying, Anthony Lo, & Ignas Niemegeers. (2009). A survey of indoor positioning systems for wireless personal networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 11(1). 13–32.1141 indexed citations breakdown →
Jacobsson, Martin, Jeroen Hoebeke, Sonia Heemstra de Groot, et al.. (2005). A Network Architecture for Personal Networks. University of Twente Research Information.13 indexed citations
16.
Lo, Anthony, Geert Heijenk, & Ignas Niemegeers. (2005). Performance evaluation of MPEG-4 video streaming over UMTS networks using an integrated tool environment. University of Twente Research Information. 676–682.29 indexed citations
17.
Lo, Anthony, et al.. (2003). Performance of TCP over UMTS common and dedicated channels. University of Twente Research Information. 138–142.4 indexed citations
Lai, Richard & Anthony Lo. (1995). An Analysis of the ISO FTAM Basic File Protocol Specified in LOTOS.. Australian Computer Journal. 27. 1–8.2 indexed citations
20.
Lo, Anthony & Richard Lai. (1993). Integrating Estelle and ASN.1 for Automatic Implementation. 155–169.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.