Citations per year, relative to Ansgar Scherp Ansgar Scherp (= 1×)
peers
Sougata Mukherjea
Countries citing papers authored by Ansgar Scherp
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ansgar Scherp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ansgar Scherp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ansgar Scherp more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ansgar Scherp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ansgar Scherp. The network helps show where Ansgar Scherp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ansgar Scherp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ansgar Scherp.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ansgar Scherp based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ansgar Scherp. Ansgar Scherp is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scherp, Ansgar, et al.. (2015). Investigating the usability of a mobile app for finding and exploring places and events. Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling). 6–10.
7.
Scherp, Ansgar, et al.. (2015). Formalization and Preliminary Evaluation of a Pipeline for Text Extraction from Infographics. Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling). 1458. 20–31.1 indexed citations
8.
Scherp, Ansgar, Vasileios Mezaris, Bogdan Ionescu, & Francesco G. B. De Natale. (2014). Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Human Centered Event Understanding from Multimedia.1 indexed citations
9.
Gottron, Thomas, et al.. (2014). From changes to dynamics: Dynamics analysis of linked open data sources. Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling). 1151.8 indexed citations
10.
Sztyler, Timo, et al.. (2014). An approach for incremental entity resolution at the example of social media data. Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling). 1200.5 indexed citations
11.
Morana, Stefan, et al.. (2014). Designing a Process Guidance System to Support User’s Business Process Compliance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2398.7 indexed citations
12.
Gangemi, Aldo, Michael Grüninger, Karl Hammar, et al.. (2014). Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Ontology and Semantic Web Patterns. International Semantic Web Conference.5 indexed citations
13.
Scherp, Ansgar, et al.. (2012). Explicit and Implicit Schema Information on the Linked Open Data Cloud: Joined Forces or Antagonists?.4 indexed citations
Scherp, Ansgar. (2007). A component framework for personalized multimedia applications. Multimedialer Archiv- und Publikationsserver der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel).3 indexed citations
16.
Scherp, Ansgar, Susanne Boll, & Holger Cremer. (2007). Emergent Semantics in Personalized Multimedia Content.. Journal of Digital Information Management. 5. 55–60.8 indexed citations
17.
Boll, Susanne, Jens Krösche, & Ansgar Scherp. (2004). Personalized mobile multimedia meets location-based services. GI Jahrestagung (2). 64–69.7 indexed citations
Scherp, Ansgar. (2001). The Rational Unified Process.. Journal of Food Protection. 67(1). 43–44.72 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.