Annie Howell

634 total citations
9 papers, 379 citations indexed

About

Annie Howell is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Annie Howell has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 379 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Health, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Annie Howell's work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers). Annie Howell is often cited by papers focused on Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers). Annie Howell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Qatar. Annie Howell's co-authors include Medina Johnson, Gene Feder, Sandra Eldridge, Chris Griffiths, Debbie Sharp, Clare Rutterford, Alison Gregory, Danielle Dunne, Kathleen Baird and Jean Ramsay and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Annie Howell

8 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annie Howell United Kingdom 5 339 191 125 117 92 9 379
Khudejha Asghar United States 12 182 0.5× 205 1.1× 85 0.7× 158 1.4× 93 1.0× 19 381
Alice Kramer United States 6 245 0.7× 153 0.8× 103 0.8× 129 1.1× 81 0.9× 7 341
Heidi Gilroy United States 14 363 1.1× 285 1.5× 189 1.5× 175 1.5× 55 0.6× 46 509
Angeles Nava United States 13 305 0.9× 234 1.2× 164 1.3× 136 1.2× 52 0.6× 34 425
Gemma McKibbin Australia 11 197 0.6× 240 1.3× 142 1.1× 131 1.1× 71 0.8× 28 374
Carole Warshaw United States 8 314 0.9× 192 1.0× 117 0.9× 121 1.0× 87 0.9× 13 391
Ana Paula Portella Brazil 6 275 0.8× 57 0.3× 194 1.6× 140 1.2× 76 0.8× 11 346
Natalia Lewis United Kingdom 10 170 0.5× 176 0.9× 75 0.6× 75 0.6× 27 0.3× 23 277
Nouha Saleh Stattin Sweden 9 118 0.3× 89 0.5× 69 0.6× 91 0.8× 51 0.6× 22 264
Diane K. Bohn United States 7 258 0.8× 242 1.3× 155 1.2× 123 1.1× 60 0.7× 8 407

Countries citing papers authored by Annie Howell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annie Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annie Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annie Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annie Howell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annie Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annie Howell. The network helps show where Annie Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annie Howell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annie Howell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annie Howell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annie Howell. Annie Howell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Doughty, Janine, Maggie Evans, Medina Johnson, et al.. (2023). Dentistry responding in domestic violence and abuse (DRiDVA) feasibility study: a qualitative evaluation of the implementation experiences of dental professionals. BMC Oral Health. 23(1). 475–475. 3 indexed citations
2.
Gregory, Alison, Annie Howell, Medina Johnson, Lucy Potter, & Sandi Dheensa. (2023). ‘I felt paralysed to ask for help for myself’: domestic abuse experienced by healthcare professionals. InnovAiT Education and inspiration for general practice. 16(4). 203–207. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Panovska‐Griffiths, Jasmina, Peter Martin, Estela Capelas Barbosa, et al.. (2020). Disruption of a primary health care domestic violence and abuse service in two London boroughs: interrupted time series evaluation. BMC Health Services Research. 20(1). 569–569. 4 indexed citations
5.
Sheikh, Saira Z., Shruti Saxena, Jennifer S. Walker, et al.. (2020). AB1360-HPR A MODEL TO IMPROVE MINORITY PATIENT RECRUITMENT IN LUPUS CLINICAL TRIALS - THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY MIMICT PROJECT EXPERIENCE. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 79. 1967–1967.
6.
Feder, Gene, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Lee Beresford, et al.. (2018). Improving the healthcare response to domestic violence and abuse in primary care: protocol for a mixed method evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention. BMC Public Health. 18(1). 971–971. 11 indexed citations
7.
Malpass, Alice, et al.. (2014). Women’s experiences of referral to a domestic violence advocate in UK primary care settings: a service-user collaborative study. British Journal of General Practice. 64(620). e151–e158. 32 indexed citations
8.
9.
Gregory, Alison, Jean Ramsay, Roxane Agnew-Davies, et al.. (2010). Primary care Identification and Referral to Improve Safety of women experiencing domestic violence (IRIS): protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 10(1). 54–54. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026