Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman

1.3k total citations
20 papers, 863 citations indexed

About

Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 863 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Health, 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman's work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers). Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman is often cited by papers focused on Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers). Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman's co-authors include Theo Verheij, Marijke M Kuyvenhoven, René van Leeuwen, Johannes C. van der Wouden, Linda Ross, Wilfred McSherry, Tove Giske, Paul Jarvis, Donia Baldacchino and Aru Narayanasamy and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Nurse Education Today.

In The Last Decade

Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman

20 papers receiving 817 citations

Peers

Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman
Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman
Citations per year, relative to Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman (= 1×) peers Lucila Amaral Carneiro Vianna

Countries citing papers authored by Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman. The network helps show where Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman. Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Leeuwen, René van & Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman. (2024). Dissemination of the Spiritual Care Competence Scale (SCCS). Journal for the Study of Spirituality. 14(1). 75–91. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cone, Pamela H., et al.. (2023). Strengths and challenges with spiritual care: Student feedback from the EPICC Spiritual Care Self‐Assessment Tool. Nursing Open. 10(10). 6923–6934. 7 indexed citations
3.
Giske, Tove, Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman, Pamela H. Cone, et al.. (2022). Developing and testing the EPICC Spiritual Care Competency Self‐Assessment Tool for student nurses and midwives. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 32(7-8). 1148–1162. 31 indexed citations
4.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, et al.. (2020). Herziene NHG-Standaard Dementie. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 63(4). 55–55. 2 indexed citations
5.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, et al.. (2019). God representations and aspects of psychological functioning: A meta-analysis. Cogent Psychology. 6(1). 37 indexed citations
6.
Ross, Linda, Wilfred McSherry, Tove Giske, et al.. (2018). Nursing and midwifery students' perceptions of spirituality, spiritual care, and spiritual care competency: A prospective, longitudinal, correlational European study. Nurse Education Today. 67. 64–71. 107 indexed citations
7.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, et al.. (2018). Competence and frequency of provision of spiritual care by nurses in the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 32(4). 1314–1321. 28 indexed citations
8.
Ross, Linda, Tove Giske, René van Leeuwen, et al.. (2015). Factors contributing to student nurses'/midwives' perceived competency in spiritual care. Nurse Education Today. 36. 445–451. 94 indexed citations
9.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, et al.. (2015). Towards a competency assessment tool for nurses in ethics meetings. Nursing Ethics. 23(4). 413–420. 8 indexed citations
10.
Leeuwen, René van & Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman. (2015). Nurses’ Perceptions of Spirituality and Spiritual Care in Different Health Care Settings in the Netherlands. Religions. 6(4). 1346–1357. 58 indexed citations
11.
Leeuwen, Johannes P.T.M. van, et al.. (2014). Being the Minority. Journal of Christian Nursing. 32(1). 26–30. 3 indexed citations
12.
Ross, Linda, René van Leeuwen, Donia Baldacchino, et al.. (2013). Student nurses perceptions of spirituality and competence in delivering spiritual care: A European pilot study. Nurse Education Today. 34(5). 697–702. 121 indexed citations
13.
Leeuwen, René van, Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman, & Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven. (2013). Screening Patient Spirituality and Spiritual Needs in Oncology Nursing. Holistic Nursing Practice. 27(4). 207–216. 14 indexed citations
14.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, et al.. (2008). Interactieve medische informatie van het Huisartsen Netwerk Utrecht en de Almere Zorggroep. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 51(2). 90–95. 6 indexed citations
15.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, Marijke M Kuyvenhoven, Theo Verheij, & Liset van Dijk. (2007). Antibiotics in Dutch general practice: nationwide electronic GP database and national reimbursement rates. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 17(4). 378–383. 33 indexed citations
16.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, Marijke M Kuyvenhoven, Johannes C. van der Wouden, & Theo Verheij. (2005). Prescribing antibiotics for respiratory tract infections by GPs: management and prescriber characteristics.. PubMed. 55(511). 114–8. 71 indexed citations
17.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, Marijke M Kuyvenhoven, Johannes C. van der Wouden, & Theo Verheij. (2005). Analysis of under- and overprescribing of antibiotics in acute otitis media in general practice. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 56(3). 569–574. 62 indexed citations
18.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, Marijke M Kuyvenhoven, Johannes C. van der Wouden, & Theo Verheij. (2005). Determinants of antibiotic overprescribing in respiratory tract infections in general practice. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 56(5). 930–936. 98 indexed citations
19.
Schep‐Akkerman, Annemiek, Johannes C. van der Wouden, Marijke M Kuyvenhoven, Jeanne P. Dieleman, & Theo Verheij. (2004). Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in Dutch primary care in relation to patient age and clinical entities. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 54(6). 1116–1121. 72 indexed citations
20.
Heerbeek, Niels van, Annemiek Schep‐Akkerman, Koen Ingels, Joost A. M. Engel, & Gerhard A. Zielhuis. (2003). Left–right differences in Eustachian tube function in children with ventilation tubes. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 67(8). 861–866. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026