Annelot C. Krediet

539 total citations
9 papers, 305 citations indexed

About

Annelot C. Krediet is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Annelot C. Krediet has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 305 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 2 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in Annelot C. Krediet's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (3 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers). Annelot C. Krediet is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (3 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers). Annelot C. Krediet collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and France. Annelot C. Krediet's co-authors include Gerbrand J. Groen, Nizar Moayeri, Paul E. Bigeleisen, Jörgen Bruhn, Geert‐Jan van Geffen, Steven H. Renes, Ronald L. A. W. Bleys, Cor J. Kalkman, Marc J. M. Bonten and Paul Barach and has published in prestigious journals such as Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Annelot C. Krediet

9 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annelot C. Krediet Netherlands 7 249 91 66 46 32 9 305
J.A.W. WILDSMITH United Kingdom 6 269 1.1× 49 0.5× 78 1.2× 89 1.9× 11 0.3× 7 339
Grant Hocking United Kingdom 6 213 0.9× 47 0.5× 78 1.2× 41 0.9× 24 0.8× 7 270
Jérôme Guilley France 7 278 1.1× 97 1.1× 35 0.5× 21 0.5× 4 0.1× 9 313
M. Dounas France 9 191 0.8× 58 0.6× 70 1.1× 39 0.8× 6 0.2× 19 275
J.M. Saïssy Senegal 9 98 0.4× 34 0.4× 45 0.7× 22 0.5× 15 0.5× 26 240
Dawit T. Haile United States 10 160 0.6× 8 0.1× 62 0.9× 88 1.9× 19 0.6× 25 331
M. Belouadah France 8 291 1.2× 20 0.2× 70 1.1× 30 0.7× 13 0.4× 16 330
Zachary R. Zimmer United States 7 313 1.3× 10 0.1× 8 0.1× 66 1.4× 15 0.5× 28 339
Gary Wilner United States 5 278 1.1× 23 0.3× 22 0.3× 285 6.2× 18 0.6× 7 507
Praveen Kumar Neema India 9 163 0.7× 7 0.1× 68 1.0× 138 3.0× 62 1.9× 88 406

Countries citing papers authored by Annelot C. Krediet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annelot C. Krediet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelot C. Krediet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelot C. Krediet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annelot C. Krediet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelot C. Krediet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelot C. Krediet. The network helps show where Annelot C. Krediet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelot C. Krediet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelot C. Krediet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelot C. Krediet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelot C. Krediet. Annelot C. Krediet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Krediet, Annelot C., et al.. (2020). Effectiveness of Epiduroscopy for Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Pain Practice. 21(4). 468–481. 15 indexed citations
2.
Bigeleisen, Paul E., et al.. (2016). Modeling, Production, and Testing of an Echogenic Needle for Ultrasound‐Guided Nerve Blocks. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 35(6). 1319–1323. 6 indexed citations
3.
Kanitakis, Jean, Annelot C. Krediet, Joachim Röwert, et al.. (2016). Prognostic value of the area and density of lymphatic vessels in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 14(11). 1114–1121. 6 indexed citations
4.
Krediet, Annelot C., Nizar Moayeri, Geert‐Jan van Geffen, et al.. (2015). Different Approaches to Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block. Anesthesiology. 123(2). 459–474. 163 indexed citations
5.
Krediet, Annelot C., Nizar Moayeri, Ronald L. A. W. Bleys, & Gerbrand J. Groen. (2014). Intraneural or Extraneural. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 39(5). 409–413. 25 indexed citations
6.
Moayeri, Nizar, Annelot C. Krediet, J. Welleweerd, Ronald L. A. W. Bleys, & Gerbrand J. Groen. (2012). Early ultrasonographic detection of low-volume intraneural injection. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 109(3). 432–438. 28 indexed citations
7.
Krediet, Annelot C., et al.. (2011). Hand-hygiene practices in the operating theatre: an observational study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 107(4). 553–558. 44 indexed citations
8.
Groen, Gerbrand J., Annelot C. Krediet, Nizar Moayeri, Jörgen Bruhn, & Geert J. van Geffen. (2010). Brachial plexus sonoanatomy explained by multiplanar reformatting of digitized anatomy. European Journal of Pain Supplements. 4(S4). 303–311. 5 indexed citations
9.
Bigeleisen, Paul E., Michael Gofeld, Steven L. Orebaugh, et al.. (2009). Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026