Anne Wein

1.3k total citations
58 papers, 810 citations indexed

About

Anne Wein is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Wein has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 810 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 19 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 13 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in Anne Wein's work include Disaster Management and Resilience (19 papers), Seismology and Earthquake Studies (16 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (13 papers). Anne Wein is often cited by papers focused on Disaster Management and Resilience (19 papers), Seismology and Earthquake Studies (16 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (13 papers). Anne Wein collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Anne Wein's co-authors include Adam Rose, Richard Bernknopf, Dan Wei, Jianhong E. Mu, Ian Sue Wing, Bruce A. McCarl, Julia Becker, Don Coursey, Sally Potter and Emma E.H. Doyle and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Applied Geography and USGS professional paper.

In The Last Decade

Anne Wein

52 papers receiving 729 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne Wein United States 16 251 192 191 185 157 58 810
Indrajit Pal Thailand 22 343 1.4× 208 1.1× 595 3.1× 193 1.0× 36 0.2× 89 1.4k
Iuliana Armaș Romania 20 766 3.1× 175 0.9× 643 3.4× 85 0.5× 50 0.3× 62 1.4k
Joachim Post Germany 15 166 0.7× 117 0.6× 291 1.5× 189 1.0× 69 0.4× 46 845
Richard Bernknopf United States 14 102 0.4× 89 0.5× 302 1.6× 79 0.4× 70 0.4× 49 845
Maxx Dilley United States 15 441 1.8× 106 0.6× 939 4.9× 42 0.2× 35 0.2× 17 1.7k
Guillermo Franco United States 14 298 1.2× 302 1.6× 405 2.1× 79 0.4× 36 0.2× 31 1.0k
Peter Zeil Austria 13 561 2.2× 126 0.7× 725 3.8× 24 0.1× 80 0.5× 39 1.5k
Scira Menoni Italy 15 321 1.3× 185 1.0× 359 1.9× 27 0.1× 22 0.1× 51 764
Marleen de Ruiter Netherlands 18 398 1.6× 119 0.6× 793 4.2× 16 0.1× 50 0.3× 58 1.2k
Michael Bründl Switzerland 15 183 0.7× 94 0.5× 486 2.5× 22 0.1× 25 0.2× 33 857

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Wein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Wein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Wein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Wein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Wein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Wein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Wein. The network helps show where Anne Wein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Wein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Wein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Wein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Wein. Anne Wein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Albano, Christine M., Christopher E. Soulard, Blake Minor, et al.. (2025). Assessing Causes and Consequences of Winter Surface Water Dynamics in California's Central Valley Using Satellite Remote Sensing. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18(2). 1 indexed citations
2.
Schneider, Max, Anne Wein, Sara K. McBride, et al.. (2025). Meet the people where they are: Assessing user needs for aftershock forecast products in El Salvador, Mexico and the United States. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 125. 105450–105450. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wilson, Tamara S., Ryan Boyles, Nicole M. DeCrappeo, et al.. (2024). U.S. Geological Survey climate science plan—Future research directions. U.S. Geological Survey circular. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wein, Anne, Sara K. McBride, Julia Becker, et al.. (2024). Long-term communication of aftershock forecasts: The Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 114. 104878–104878. 1 indexed citations
5.
Watson, Maria, Charlotte Brown, John Handmer, et al.. (2023). Methods and lessons for business resilience and recovery surveys. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 93. 103743–103743. 5 indexed citations
6.
Wing, Ian Sue, Adam Rose, Dan Wei, & Anne Wein. (2023). The Long Shadow of a Major Disaster: Modeled Dynamic Impacts of the Hypothetical HayWired Earthquake on California’s Economy. International Regional Science Review. 47(5-6). 655–696. 2 indexed citations
7.
Soulard, Christopher E., et al.. (2022). Using Landsat and MODIS satellite collections to examine extent, timing, and potential impacts of surface water inundation in California croplands. Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment. 28. 100837–100837. 3 indexed citations
8.
Gomberg, Joan, K. A. Ludwig, B. Bekins, et al.. (2017). Reducing risk where tectonic plates collide—U.S. Geological Survey subduction zone science plan. U.S. Geological Survey circular. 10 indexed citations
9.
Field, Edward H., Jeanne L. Hardebeck, A. L. Llenos, et al.. (2016). Aftershock Forecasting: Recent Developments and Lessons from the 2016 M5.8 Pawnee, Oklahoma, Earthquake. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2016. 3 indexed citations
10.
Becker, Julia, et al.. (2015). Aftershock communication during the Canterbury Earthquakes, New Zealand: Implications for response and recovery in the built environment. 12 indexed citations
11.
Holmes, Robert R., Lucile M. Jones, Jeffery C. Eidenshink, et al.. (2013). U.S. Geological Survey natural hazards science strategy— Promoting the safety, security, and economic well-being of the Nation. U.S. Geological Survey circular. 11 indexed citations
12.
Wing, Ian Sue, Anne Wein, Adam J. Rose, & Dan Wei. (2013). Economic impacts of the SAFRR tsunami scenario in California. 6 indexed citations
13.
Wein, Anne, Laurie A. Johnson, & Richard Bernknopf. (2011). Recovering from the ShakeOut Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra. 27(2). 521–538. 15 indexed citations
14.
Wein, Anne & Adam Rose. (2011). Economic Resilience Lessons from the ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario. Earthquake Spectra. 27(2). 559–573. 35 indexed citations
15.
Rose, Adam, Dan Wei, & Anne Wein. (2011). Economic Impacts of the ShakeOut Scenario. Earthquake Spectra. 27(2). 539–557. 30 indexed citations
16.
Bouchard, Michelle, David Butman, Todd J. Hawbaker, et al.. (2011). Baseline and projected future carbon storage and greenhouse-gas fluxes in the Great Plains region of the United States. USGS professional paper. 25 indexed citations
17.
Porter, Keith, Lucile M. Jones, Dale A. Cox, et al.. (2011). The ShakeOut Scenario: A Hypothetical M w 7.8 Earthquake on the Southern San Andreas Fault. Earthquake Spectra. 27(2). 239–261. 39 indexed citations
18.
Hudnut, K. W., et al.. (2011). Foreword. Earthquake Spectra. 27(2). 235–237. 2 indexed citations
19.
Cox, Dale A., Lucile M. Jones, F. Martin Ralph, et al.. (2009). ARkStorm: A West Coast Storm Scenario. AGUFM. 2009. 2 indexed citations
20.
Wein, Anne, et al.. (2005). The no-project alternative analysis: An early product of the Tahoe Decision Support System. 2(1). 15–28. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026