Anne Stene

36 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

Anne Stene
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Aquatic Science 164
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 158
  • Ecology 242
  • Immunology 182
  • Endocrinology 43
Replace M. F. Mulcahy with:
M. F. Mulcahy Ireland
Stein Mortensen Norway
Henning André Urke Norway
Charles C. Mischke United States
Aurélia Saraiva Portugal
Ahmed Siah Canada
Edmir Daniel Carvalho Brazil
Judith Handlinger Australia
Mar Marcos‐López United Kingdom
Duane E. Barker Canada
Anne Stene relative to M. F. Mulcahy Ireland M. F. Mulcahy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
M. F. Mulcahy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Stene

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Stene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Stene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Stene more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Stene

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Stene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Stene. The network helps show where Anne Stene may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Stene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Stene Line = papers co-authored together Anne Stene links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201964
2 201351
3 201735
4 200133
5 201330
6 200427
7 201626
8 198626
9 201726
10 201924
11 201021
12 199921
13 198419
14 202117
15 202117
16 202017
17 198517
18 202114
19 201513
20 198510

About Anne Stene

Anne Stene is a scholar working on Immunology, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 37 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (17 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (8 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (8 papers), Marine and fisheries research (5 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (5 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (3 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (164 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (158 citations), Ecology (242 citations), Immunology (182 citations) and Endocrinology (43 citations). Anne Stene has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Sunniva Lønning, Vidar Aspehaug, Hildegunn Viljugrein, Ole Thomas Albert, Ann‐Kristin Tveten, Agnes C. Gundersen, Lars Christian Gansel, Friederike Ziegler, Mona Dverdal Jansen and John Davenport. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fish Diseases, Sarsia, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Fish & Shellfish Immunology and Aquaculture Environment Interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact