Anne Lainchbury

901 total citations
18 papers, 533 citations indexed

About

Anne Lainchbury is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Lainchbury has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 533 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 4 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Anne Lainchbury's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (11 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (4 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers). Anne Lainchbury is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (11 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (4 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers). Anne Lainchbury collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Anne Lainchbury's co-authors include Mark Tracy, Sally Tracy, Donna Hartz, Alec Welsh, Jan White, Andrew Bisits, Jyai Allen, Sue Kildea, Maralyn Foureur and Caroline Homer and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

In The Last Decade

Anne Lainchbury

17 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Anne Lainchbury

PPCH

PHEOH

GHP

Cristina Fernandez Turienzo United Kingdom

Allison Cummins Australia

Celia P. Grigg Australia

Karyn Kaufman Canada

Vidanka Vasilevski Australia

Helen Watson United Kingdom

Margaret Maimbolwa Zambia

Kathryn Millar United States

Ulrika Byrskog Sweden

Wanda Phillips-Beck Canada

Cristina Fernandez Turienzo United Kingdom

Anne Lainchbury

264 ×0.7

174 ×0.7

PPCH

113 ×0.8

PHEOH

141 ×1.1

GHP

87 ×1.0

Citations per year, relative to Anne Lainchbury Anne Lainchbury (= 1×) peers Cristina Fernandez Turienzo

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Lainchbury

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Lainchbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Lainchbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Lainchbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Lainchbury

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Lainchbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Lainchbury. The network helps show where Anne Lainchbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Lainchbury

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Lainchbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Lainchbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Lainchbury. Anne Lainchbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Shand, Antonia, et al.. (2022). Birth outcomes by type of attendance at antenatal education: An observational study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 62(6). 859–867. 10 indexed citations

Nielsen, Timothy C., Natasha Nassar, Amanda Henry, et al.. (2022). Cross-sectional survey of antenatal education attendance among nulliparous pregnant women in Sydney, Australia. Women and Birth. 36(2). e276–e282. 8 indexed citations

Smithers‐Sheedy, Hayley, Ruth King, Lisa Hui, et al.. (2022). eLearning significantly improves maternity professionals’ knowledge of the congenital cytomegalovirus prevention guidelines. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 62(3). 445–452. 11 indexed citations

Henry, Amanda, Jennifer Yang, Lynne M. Roberts, et al.. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Telehealth on Antenatal Screening and Services, Including for Mental Health and Domestic Violence: An Australian Mixed-Methods Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 819953–819953. 9 indexed citations

Henry, Amanda, Caroline A Crowther, Anne Lainchbury, et al.. (2021). Short-Term Effects of Dexamethasone versus Betamethasone on Ultrasonic Measures of Fetal Well-Being: Cohort from a Blinded, Randomized Trial. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 48(7). 526–540. 2 indexed citations

Fox, Deborah, Vanessa Scarf, Andrew Bisits, et al.. (2021). Harnessing technology to enable all women mobility in labour and birth: feasibility of implementing beltless non-invasive fetal ECG applying the NASSS framework. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 7(1). 214–214. 13 indexed citations

Coates, Dominiek, et al.. (2020). Women’s experiences of decision‐making and beliefs in relation to planned caesarean section: A survey study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 61(1). 106–115. 9 indexed citations

Rawlinson, William D ., et al.. (2019). Knowledge of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) in pregnant women in Australia is low, and improved with education. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 59(6). 843–849. 19 indexed citations

Nassar, Natasha, et al.. (2018). Maternal car driving capacity after birth: a pilot prospective study randomizing postnatal women to early verses late driving in a driving simulator. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 33(8). 1–8. 5 indexed citations

10.

Shand, Antonia, et al.. (2016). Knowledge, advice and attitudes toward women driving a car after caesarean section or hysterectomy: A survey of obstetrician/gynaecologists and midwives. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 56(5). 460–465. 6 indexed citations

11.

Tracy, Sally, Alec Welsh, Donna Hartz, et al.. (2014). Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 14(1). 46–46. 79 indexed citations

12.

Tracy, Sally, Donna Hartz, Mark Tracy, et al.. (2014). Caseload Midwifery Care Versus Standard Maternity Care for Women of Any Risk. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 34(4). 234–235. 29 indexed citations

13.

Tracy, Sally, Donna Hartz, Mark Tracy, et al.. (2013). Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 382(9906). 1723–1732. 228 indexed citations

14.

Hartz, Donna, Jyai Allen, Anne Lainchbury, et al.. (2013). The M@NGO Trial: Does caseload midwifery reduce caesarean section operation rates?. Women and Birth. 26. S8–S9. 7 indexed citations

15.

Tracy, Sally, Donna Hartz, Jyai Allen, et al.. (2011). A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: M@NGO (Midwives @ New Group practice Options). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 11(1). 82–82. 39 indexed citations

16.

Williams, Kathryn, Luise Lago, Anne Lainchbury, & Kathy Eagar. (2009). Mothers’ views of caseload midwifery and the value of continuity of care at an Australian regional hospital. Midwifery. 26(6). 615–621. 55 indexed citations

17.

Williams, Kathryn, Anne Lainchbury, & Kathy Eagar. (2005). Evaluation of a midwifery model of care. Research Online (University of Wollongong).

18.

Williams, Kathryn, Anne Lainchbury, & Kathy Eagar. (2005). The Illawarra Midwifery Group Practice Program - the evaluation of a pilot program to introduce a safe and continuous model of care. Figshare. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact