Anne C. Travis

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 933 citations indexed

About

Anne C. Travis is a scholar working on Surgery, Gastroenterology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne C. Travis has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 933 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Gastroenterology and 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Anne C. Travis's work include Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (7 papers) and Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (6 papers). Anne C. Travis is often cited by papers focused on Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (7 papers) and Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (6 papers). Anne C. Travis collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Anne C. Travis's co-authors include John R. Saltzman, Marwan S. Abougergi, Brian Hyett, Xiaowu Sun, Ying P. Tabak, Richard S. Johannes, Navin L. Kumar, Suzana Brozović, Brian Claggett and William M. Weightman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, The American Journal of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

Anne C. Travis

17 papers receiving 903 citations

Hit Papers

A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital morta... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne C. Travis United States 12 739 667 157 66 64 17 933
Sarah Hearnshaw United Kingdom 13 881 1.2× 713 1.1× 136 0.9× 120 1.8× 84 1.3× 33 1.1k
E. M. Vreeburg Netherlands 6 854 1.2× 761 1.1× 145 0.9× 31 0.5× 26 0.4× 9 964
T J Crofts United Kingdom 11 322 0.4× 595 0.9× 296 1.9× 14 0.2× 12 0.2× 23 750
Nai-Jen Liu Taiwan 13 110 0.1× 408 0.6× 208 1.3× 121 1.8× 102 1.6× 21 564
Jörg Zehetner United States 17 626 0.8× 1.7k 2.5× 852 5.4× 58 0.9× 84 1.3× 34 1.8k
Élisabeth Féry-Lemonnier France 10 95 0.1× 291 0.4× 74 0.5× 39 0.6× 116 1.8× 25 539
Alexandra W. Acher United States 16 92 0.1× 358 0.5× 341 2.2× 17 0.3× 58 0.9× 42 662
Miloslawa Stem United States 22 241 0.3× 797 1.2× 290 1.8× 26 0.4× 51 0.8× 63 1.1k
Andrew D. Jung United States 11 39 0.1× 242 0.4× 75 0.5× 25 0.4× 49 0.8× 33 393
Diana Castillo United States 11 72 0.1× 95 0.1× 61 0.4× 61 0.9× 80 1.3× 14 400

Countries citing papers authored by Anne C. Travis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne C. Travis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne C. Travis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne C. Travis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne C. Travis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne C. Travis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne C. Travis. The network helps show where Anne C. Travis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne C. Travis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne C. Travis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne C. Travis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne C. Travis. Anne C. Travis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Kumar, Navin L., Anne C. Travis, & John R. Saltzman. (2016). Initial management and timing of endoscopy in nonvariceal upper GI bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 84(1). 10–17. 25 indexed citations
2.
Simon, Tracey G., Anne C. Travis, & John R. Saltzman. (2015). Initial Assessment and Resuscitation in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 25(3). 429–442. 12 indexed citations
3.
Abougergi, Marwan S., Emily D. Bethea, Dominic J. Nompleggi, et al.. (2015). A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AIMS65 Score Compared With the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 50(6). 464–469. 40 indexed citations
4.
Abougergi, Marwan S., Anne C. Travis, & John R. Saltzman. (2014). Impact of day of admission on mortality and other outcomes in upper GI hemorrhage: A nationwide analysis. Acta gastro-enterologica belgica. 56(10). 3 indexed citations
5.
Bethea, Emily D., Anne C. Travis, & John R. Saltzman. (2014). Initial Assessment and Management of Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 48(10). 823–829. 4 indexed citations
6.
Abougergi, Marwan S., Anne C. Travis, & John R. Saltzman. (2014). The in-hospital mortality rate for upper GI hemorrhage has decreased over 2 decades in the United States: a nationwide analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 81(4). 882–888.e1. 188 indexed citations
7.
Abougergi, Marwan S., Anne C. Travis, & John R. Saltzman. (2014). Impact of day of admission on mortality and other outcomes in upper GI hemorrhage: a nationwide analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 80(2). 228–235.e1. 43 indexed citations
8.
Saltzman, John R., Mark Feldman, & Anne C. Travis. (2014). Approach to acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults. 9 indexed citations
9.
Hyett, Brian, Marwan S. Abougergi, Navin L. Kumar, et al.. (2013). The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 77(4). 551–557. 111 indexed citations
10.
Travis, Anne C., et al.. (2012). Endoscopy in the Elderly. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 107(10). 1495–1501. 71 indexed citations
11.
Travis, Anne C., Swati Pawa, Julia K. Leblanc, & Arvey I. Rogers. (2011). Denial: What Is It, How Do We Recognize It, and What Should We Do About It?. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 106(6). 1028–1030. 3 indexed citations
12.
Saltzman, John R., Ying P. Tabak, Brian Hyett, et al.. (2011). A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 74(6). 1215–1224. 338 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Agrawal, Jaya, Anne C. Travis, Koenraad J. Mortelé, et al.. (2011). Diagnostic yield of dual‐phase computed tomography enterography in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and a non‐diagnostic capsule endoscopy. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 27(4). 751–759. 31 indexed citations
14.
Travis, Anne C., Philip O. Katz, & Sunanda V. Kane. (2010). Mentoring in Gastroenterology. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 105(5). 970–972. 15 indexed citations
16.
Travis, Anne C., Sharmeel K. Wasan, & John R. Saltzman. (2008). Model to predict rebleeding following endoscopic therapy for non‐variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 23(10). 1505–1510. 19 indexed citations
17.
Thorner, Anna R., et al.. (2001). Unusual Presentations of Malignancy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 19(13). 3291–3293. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026