Anna Tostevin

489 total citations
2 papers, 2 citations indexed

About

Anna Tostevin is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Tostevin has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 2 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in General Health Professions, 1 paper in Infectious Diseases and 1 paper in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anna Tostevin's work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (1 paper). Anna Tostevin is often cited by papers focused on Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (1 paper). Anna Tostevin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Finland. Anna Tostevin's co-authors include Andrew Copas, Hamish Mohammed, Jo Gibbs, Alison Howarth, Fiona Burns, John Saunders, Claudia Estcourt, Oliver Stirrup, Victoria Tittle and Sara Day and has published in prestigious journals such as Sexually Transmitted Infections and The Lancet Regional Health - Europe.

In The Last Decade

Anna Tostevin

1 paper receiving 2 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Tostevin United Kingdom	1	1	1	1	1	1	2	2
Yusuke Inoue Japan	1						2	2
H. R. Qi China	2						6	3
Y. R. Hou China	2						10	4
M. Velasco Italy	2						2	2
J. Chu China	2						2	2
Liu Zhao-feng China	1						2	2
Marina Fayzullina United States	2						2	2
Y. Zeng China	2						4	3
S. Garni Switzerland	1						2	4
Q. P. Ji China	2						2	3

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Tostevin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Tostevin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Tostevin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Tostevin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Tostevin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Tostevin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Tostevin. The network helps show where Anna Tostevin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Tostevin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Tostevin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Tostevin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Tostevin. Anna Tostevin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

2 of 2 papers shown

1.

Howarth, Alison, Hamish Mohammed, Fiona Burns, et al.. (2025). Uptake, positivity, and equity of online postal self-sampling for chlamydia testing in England: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. 56. 101412–101412.

2.

Tittle, Victoria, Sara Day, Anna Tostevin, et al.. (2024). An evaluation of an online STI service across London: reviewing uptake, utility and outcomes over a 4-year period. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 101(1). 41–48. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact