Anna T. Prescott

586 total citations
7 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Anna T. Prescott is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna T. Prescott has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Anna T. Prescott's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers). Anna T. Prescott is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers). Anna T. Prescott collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Türkiye. Anna T. Prescott's co-authors include Jay G. Hull, James D. Sargent, Tor D. Tosteson, Marie Bakitas, J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom, Kathleen Doyle Lyons, Zhongze Li, Konstantin H. Dragnev, Dheeraj Raju and Jennifer Frost and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Anna T. Prescott

7 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna T. Prescott United States	5	174	97	96	87	73	7	336
Otilia Tudorel Romania	10	105 0.6×	28 0.3×	58 0.6×	27 0.3×	168 2.3×	17	287
Puja Iyer United States	8	195 1.1×	76 0.8×	38 0.4×	177 2.0×	129 1.8×	12	399
Ruth Plackett United Kingdom	9	100 0.6×	76 0.8×	24 0.3×	70 0.8×	80 1.1×	24	362
Christina West Canada	10	80 0.5×	50 0.5×	43 0.4×	30 0.3×	60 0.8×	20	293
Christopher M. Swoboda United States	11	53 0.3×	35 0.4×	109 1.1×	27 0.3×	95 1.3×	21	332
Jason S. Spendelow United Kingdom	10	72 0.4×	47 0.5×	102 1.1×	19 0.2×	186 2.5×	12	336
Ruvanee P. Vilhauer United States	9	85 0.5×	46 0.5×	48 0.5×	16 0.2×	49 0.7×	13	292
Charles Grant United States	8	73 0.4×	51 0.5×	57 0.6×	24 0.3×	32 0.4×	17	289
María Cámara Spain	7	129 0.7×	33 0.3×	102 1.1×	75 0.9×	210 2.9×	14	408
Chloe J. Cattle United States	9	97 0.6×	36 0.4×	71 0.7×	72 0.8×	188 2.6×	12	314

Countries citing papers authored by Anna T. Prescott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna T. Prescott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna T. Prescott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna T. Prescott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna T. Prescott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna T. Prescott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna T. Prescott. The network helps show where Anna T. Prescott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna T. Prescott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna T. Prescott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna T. Prescott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna T. Prescott. Anna T. Prescott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Prescott, Anna T., James D. Sargent, & Jay G. Hull. (2018). Metaanalysis of the relationship between violent video game play and physical aggression over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(40). 9882–9888. 148 indexed citations

Prescott, Anna T., Jay G. Hull, J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom, et al.. (2017). The role of a palliative care intervention in moderating the relationship between depression and survival among individuals with advanced cancer.. Health Psychology. 36(12). 1140–1146. 15 indexed citations

Dionne‐Odom, J. Nicholas, Andrés Azuero, Kathleen Doyle Lyons, et al.. (2016). Family Caregiver Depressive Symptom and Grief Outcomes From the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 52(3). 378–385. 51 indexed citations

Dionne‐Odom, J. Nicholas, Jay G. Hull, Michelle Y. Martin, et al.. (2016). Associations between advanced cancer patients' survival and family caregiver presence and burden. Cancer Medicine. 5(5). 853–862. 59 indexed citations

Bakitas, Marie, Jay G. Hull, J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom, Anna T. Prescott, & Tor D. Tosteson. (2015). Depression Moderates the Positive Impact of Early Palliative Care on Survival Among Advanced Cancer Patients (FR467-E). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 49(2). 383–383. 1 indexed citations

Hull, Jay G., et al.. (2014). A longitudinal study of risk-glorifying video games and behavioral deviance.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 107(2). 300–325. 58 indexed citations

Prescott, Anna T., Jay G. Hull, J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom, et al.. (2014). Effect of early palliative care on depression and survival in patients with advanced cancer.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 32(31_suppl). 5–5. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact