Anna Schleifer

578 total citations
8 papers, 184 citations indexed

About

Anna Schleifer is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pollution and Control and Systems Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Schleifer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 184 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 4 papers in Pollution and 2 papers in Control and Systems Engineering. Recurrent topics in Anna Schleifer's work include Smart Grid Energy Management (5 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (4 papers) and Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (3 papers). Anna Schleifer is often cited by papers focused on Smart Grid Energy Management (5 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (4 papers) and Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (3 papers). Anna Schleifer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Anna Schleifer's co-authors include Caitlin Murphy, Wesley Cole, Paul Denholm, Dylan Harrison‐Atlas, Gord Stephen, Xu Ma, Di Wu, Patrick Balducci, Jonghwan Kwon and Bruce Hamilton and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews and Applied Energy.

In The Last Decade

Anna Schleifer

7 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Schleifer United States	5	139	72	46	43	28	8	184
Sumanth Yamujala India	9	225 1.6×	47 0.7×	96 2.1×	48 1.1×	41 1.5×	24	302
Mustafa Tahir China	12	252 1.8×	105 1.5×	41 0.9×	46 1.1×	31 1.1×	29	338
Alexander Zolan United States	8	91 0.7×	38 0.5×	45 1.0×	23 0.5×	68 2.4×	30	186
Atik Jawad Bangladesh	7	164 1.2×	64 0.9×	140 3.0×	24 0.6×	41 1.5×	38	256
Nicholas DiOrio United States	6	153 1.1×	49 0.7×	87 1.9×	37 0.9×	29 1.0×	9	208
Akito Nakadomari Japan	10	242 1.7×	109 1.5×	130 2.8×	56 1.3×	30 1.1×	22	326
Kendall Mongird United States	6	160 1.2×	57 0.8×	73 1.6×	34 0.8×	20 0.7×	16	228
Ahmad Shah Irshad Afghanistan	11	141 1.0×	141 2.0×	75 1.6×	83 1.9×	55 2.0×	21	291
Sivapriya Mothilal Bhagavathy United Kingdom	11	242 1.7×	55 0.8×	91 2.0×	33 0.8×	54 1.9×	21	303
Md Abu Shahid Abdullah Australia	9	253 1.8×	66 0.9×	141 3.1×	35 0.8×	32 1.1×	18	333

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Schleifer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schleifer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schleifer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schleifer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Schleifer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schleifer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schleifer. The network helps show where Anna Schleifer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Schleifer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Schleifer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Schleifer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Schleifer. Anna Schleifer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Schleifer, Anna, Stuart Cohen, Wesley Cole, Paul Denholm, & Nate Blair. (2025). Exploring the Future Energy Value of Long-Duration Energy Storage. Energies. 18(7). 1751–1751.

2.

Schleifer, Anna, Dylan Harrison‐Atlas, Wesley Cole, & Caitlin Murphy. (2023). Hybrid renewable energy systems: the value of storage as a function of PV-wind variability. Frontiers in Energy Research. 11. 12 indexed citations

3.

Balducci, Patrick, Xu Ma, Di Wu, et al.. (2023). New Tool Evaluates the Financial Viability of Pumped Storage Hydropower. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine. 21(6). 98–109. 1 indexed citations

4.

Murphy, Caitlin, et al.. (2023). Impacts of hybridization and forecast errors on the probabilistic capacity credit of batteries. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(2). 100021–100021. 3 indexed citations

5.

Harrison‐Atlas, Dylan, et al.. (2022). Temporal complementarity and value of wind-PV hybrid systems across the United States. Renewable Energy. 201. 111–123. 28 indexed citations

6.

Schleifer, Anna, Caitlin Murphy, Wesley Cole, & Paul Denholm. (2021). The evolving energy and capacity values of utility-scale PV-plus-battery hybrid system architectures. Advances in Applied Energy. 2. 100015–100015. 57 indexed citations

7.

Schleifer, Anna, Caitlin Murphy, Wesley Cole, & Paul Denholm. (2021). Exploring the design space of PV-plus-battery system configurations under evolving grid conditions. Applied Energy. 308. 118339–118339. 25 indexed citations

8.

Murphy, Caitlin, et al.. (2021). A taxonomy of systems that combine utility-scale renewable energy and energy storage technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 139. 110711–110711. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact