Anna Poma

59 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Anna Poma
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 119
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 182
  • Analytical Chemistry 109
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 33
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 142
Replace Markus Schröder with:
Markus Schröder Germany
Kamila Syslová Czechia
Lewis B. Kinter United States
Zuzanna Setkowicz Poland
Wenxiang Wang China
Yanjie Sun United States
Akiko Yamamoto Japan
Yuko Doi Japan
Dennis P. Nelson United States
Anna Poma relative to Markus Schröder Germany Markus Schröder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Markus Schröder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Poma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Poma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Poma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Poma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Poma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Poma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Poma. The network helps show where Anna Poma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Poma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Poma Line = papers co-authored together Anna Poma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011141
2 2013141
3 1997104
4 201297
5 199969
6 200763
7 200650
8 201537
9 200835
10 201534
11 199631
12 200031
13 199929
14 200327
15 199226
16 200423
17 200621
18 201419
19 198818
20 199717

About Anna Poma

Anna Poma is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Immunology, Plant Science and Biotechnology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include melanin and skin pigmentation (11 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (10 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (9 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (6 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (5 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (4 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers) and Heavy Metals in Plants (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (119 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (182 citations), Analytical Chemistry (109 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (33 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (142 citations). Anna Poma has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Russia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include S. Santucci, Anna Maria Ragnelli, Michele Miranda, Alfredo Costa, Giuseppe Chichiriccò, Pierpaolo Aimola, Sebastiano Di Bucchianico, Giuseppe Carlucci, Giuseppe Nappi and Laura Spanò. Their work appears in journals such as Microscopy Research and Technique, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Mutagenesis, Journal of Microscopy and Melanoma Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact