Anna Ordog

410 total citations
9 papers, 71 citations indexed

About

Anna Ordog is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Ordog has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 71 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Anna Ordog's work include Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers). Anna Ordog is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers). Anna Ordog collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Anna Ordog's co-authors include J. C. Brown, R. Kothes, T. L. Landecker, Geoff Campbell, A. I. Lvovsky, Shude Mao, Alex S. Hill, B. Uyanıker, Kevin A. Douglas and Vibor Jelić and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

In The Last Decade

Anna Ordog

7 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Ordog Canada	6	53	22	16	9	8	9	71
Helen Qu United States	4	106 2.0×	42 1.9×	3 0.2×	4 0.4×	11 1.4×	9	131
Marios Maroudas Greece	4	47 0.9×	41 1.9×	10 0.6×		3 0.4×	12	60
Jane Kaczmarek Canada	5	100 1.9×	34 1.5×	5 0.3×	3 0.3×	2 0.3×	14	109
A. G. Butkevich Russia	6	74 1.4×	10 0.5×	7 0.4×	6 0.7×	3 0.4×	13	83
Ari Mujunen Finland	6	61 1.2×	27 1.2×	4 0.3×	2 0.2×	6 0.8×	19	73
Matthew C. Digman United States	5	60 1.1×	54 2.5×	16 1.0×		2 0.3×	7	88
Roger de Belsunce United States	6	71 1.3×	30 1.4×	5 0.3×	2 0.2×	2 0.3×	12	92
M. Sharma India	6	50 0.9×	40 1.8×	4 0.3×	4 0.4×	3 0.4×	15	67
R. Terenzi Italy	7	88 1.7×	14 0.6×	12 0.8×	1 0.1×	14 1.8×	10	90
M. Iacobelli Netherlands	8	132 2.5×	96 4.4×	4 0.3×	4 0.4×	4 0.5×	13	143

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Ordog

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Ordog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Ordog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Ordog more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Ordog

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Ordog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Ordog. The network helps show where Anna Ordog may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Ordog

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Ordog. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Ordog based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Ordog. Anna Ordog is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Shaw, J. Richard, Kevin Bandura, Arnab Chakraborty, et al.. (2025). Beam Maps of the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) Measured With a Drone. IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation. 6(3). 928–940.

Amiri, M., Simon Foreman, M. Halpern, et al.. (2024). Holographic Beam Measurements of the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME). The Astrophysical Journal. 976(2). 163–163. 2 indexed citations

Haverkorn, M., J. M. Stil, Xun Sun, et al.. (2024). Faraday moments of the Southern Twenty-centimeter All-sky Polarization Survey (STAPS). Astronomy and Astrophysics. 695. A101–A101. 1 indexed citations

Dickey, J. M., Jennifer West, A. J. M. Thomson, et al.. (2022). Structure in the Magnetic Field of the Milky Way Disk and Halo Traced by Faraday Rotation. The Astrophysical Journal. 940(1). 75–75. 16 indexed citations

Thomson, A. J. M., T. L. Landecker, N. M. McClure‐Griffiths, et al.. (2021). The Global Magneto-Ionic Medium Survey (GMIMS): the brightest polarized region in the southern sky at 75 cm and its implications for Radio Loop II. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 507(3). 3495–3518. 8 indexed citations

Eck, Cameron L. Van, J. C. Brown, Anna Ordog, et al.. (2021). Revisiting Rotation Measures from the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey: the Magnetic Field in the Disk of the Outer Galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 253(2). 48–48. 7 indexed citations

Mao, Shude, et al.. (2020). The complex large-scale magnetic fields in the first Galactic quadrant as revealed by the Faraday depth profile disparity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 497(3). 3097–3117. 14 indexed citations

Ordog, Anna, J. C. Brown, R. Kothes, & T. L. Landecker. (2017). Three-dimensional structure of the magnetic field in the disk of the Milky Way. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 12 indexed citations

Campbell, Geoff, Anna Ordog, & A. I. Lvovsky. (2009). Multimode electromagnetically induced transparency on a single atomic line. New Journal of Physics. 11(10). 103021–103021. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact