Anna Lowit

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
25 papers, 689 citations indexed

About

Anna Lowit is a scholar working on Small Animals, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Lowit has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 689 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Small Animals, 11 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 11 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Anna Lowit's work include Animal testing and alternatives (12 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (11 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers). Anna Lowit is often cited by papers focused on Animal testing and alternatives (12 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (11 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers). Anna Lowit collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Italy. Anna Lowit's co-authors include Nicole Kleinstreuer, Warren Casey, Amy J. Clippinger, David Allen, José G. Barroso, Monique M. Perron, Joanna Matheson, Judy Strickland, Abigail Jacobs and John Gordon and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology and Toxicological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Anna Lowit

25 papers receiving 667 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies

2022 142 citations José G. Barroso, Patience Browne et al. Archives of Toxicology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Lowit United States	14	225	221	150	106	102	25	689
Elisabet Berggren Italy	10	199 0.9×	318 1.4×	92 0.6×	134 1.3×	116 1.1×	23	688
Joop de Knecht Netherlands	6	136 0.6×	213 1.0×	72 0.5×	74 0.7×	147 1.4×	16	598
Catherine Mahony United Kingdom	17	266 1.2×	255 1.2×	139 0.9×	93 0.9×	156 1.5×	36	922
Matthew Dent United Kingdom	12	177 0.8×	221 1.0×	75 0.5×	40 0.4×	89 0.9×	29	575
Martina Klarić Belgium	17	318 1.4×	201 0.9×	127 0.8×	296 2.8×	122 1.2×	31	800
Karen Blackburn United States	18	225 1.0×	366 1.7×	157 1.0×	82 0.8×	232 2.3×	32	1.1k
L.K. Earl United Kingdom	14	298 1.3×	129 0.6×	59 0.4×	70 0.7×	70 0.7×	31	583
E. Dinant Kroese Netherlands	15	96 0.4×	274 1.2×	87 0.6×	29 0.3×	54 0.5×	26	683
Ian Crawford Dewhurst United Kingdom	16	115 0.5×	284 1.3×	284 1.9×	54 0.5×	43 0.4×	39	835
Robert A. Scala United States	14	257 1.1×	219 1.0×	76 0.5×	66 0.6×	33 0.3×	31	731

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Lowit

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Lowit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Lowit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Lowit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Lowit

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Lowit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Lowit. The network helps show where Anna Lowit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Lowit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Lowit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Lowit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Lowit. Anna Lowit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Stucki, A., Ursula G. Sauer, David Allen, et al.. (2024). Differences in the anatomy and physiology of the human and rat respiratory tracts and impact on toxicological assessments. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 150. 105648–105648. 11 indexed citations

Mansouri, Kamel, et al.. (2024). Evaluation of in silico model predictions for mammalian acute oral toxicity and regulatory application in pesticide hazard and risk assessment. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 149. 105614–105614. 5 indexed citations

Auerbach, Scott S., Logan J. Everett, Beena Vallanat, et al.. (2024). A new approach methodology to identify tumorigenic chemicals using short-term exposures and transcript profiling. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 1422325–1422325. 2 indexed citations

Patlewicz, Grace, Richard Judson, Antony Williams, et al.. (2024). Development of chemical categories for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and the proof-of-concept approach to the identification of potential candidates for tiered toxicological testing and human health assessment. Computational Toxicology. 31. 100327–100327. 9 indexed citations

Strickland, Judy, David Allen, Dori R. Germolec, et al.. (2022). Application of Defined Approaches to Assess Skin Sensitization Potency of Isothiazolinone Compounds. PubMed. 8(4). 117–128. 4 indexed citations

Barroso, José G., Patience Browne, Warren Casey, et al.. (2022). A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies. Archives of Toxicology. 96(11). 2865–2879. 142 indexed citations breakdown →

Lowit, Anna, Theresa M. Freudenrich, Kathleen Wallace, et al.. (2022). Integration of toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic new approach methods into a weight-of-evidence analysis for pesticide developmental neurotoxicity assessment: A case-study with DL- and L-glufosinate. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 131. 105167–105167. 20 indexed citations

Hamm, Jon, David Allen, Patricia Ceger, et al.. (2021). Performance of the GHS Mixtures Equation for Predicting Acute Oral Toxicity. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 125. 105007–105007. 15 indexed citations

Gordon, John, Matthew Johnson, Emily N. Reinke, et al.. (2021). Measuring U.S. Federal Agency progress toward implementation of alternative methods in toxicity testing. 2 indexed citations

10.

Hilton, Gina M., Gregory Akerman, Roland Buesen, et al.. (2021). Rethinking carcinogenicity assessment for agrochemicals. Toxicology Letters. 350. S215–S215. 1 indexed citations

11.

Hilton, Gina M., et al.. (2019). Evaluation of the avian acute oral and sub-acute dietary toxicity test for pesticide registration. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 105. 30–35. 14 indexed citations

12.

Craig, Evisabel A., et al.. (2019). Reducing the need for animal testing while increasing efficiency in a pesticide regulatory setting: Lessons from the EPA Office of Pesticide Programs’ Hazard and Science Policy Council. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 108. 104481–104481. 33 indexed citations

13.

Leonard, Jeremy A., Mark Nelms, Evisabel A. Craig, et al.. (2019). A weight of evidence approach to investigate potential common mechanisms in pesticide groups to support cumulative risk assessment: A case study with dinitroaniline pesticides. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 107. 104419–104419. 8 indexed citations

14.

Strickland, Judy, Amy J. Clippinger, Jeffrey Brown, et al.. (2018). Status of acute systemic toxicity testing requirements and data uses by U.S. regulatory agencies. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 94. 183–196. 66 indexed citations

15.

Clippinger, Amy J., David Allen, Annie M. Jarabek, et al.. (2017). Alternative approaches for acute inhalation toxicity testing to address global regulatory and non-regulatory data requirements: An international workshop report. Toxicology in Vitro. 48. 53–70. 69 indexed citations

16.

Casati, Silvana, Karin Aschberger, José G. Barroso, et al.. (2017). Standardisation of defined approaches for skin sensitisation testing to support regulatory use and international adoption: position of the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods. Archives of Toxicology. 92(2). 611–617. 51 indexed citations

17.

Casey, Warren, Abigail Jacobs, Elizabeth A. Maull, et al.. (2015). A new path forward: the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) and National Toxicology Program's Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM).. PubMed. 54(2). 170–3. 21 indexed citations

18.

Doe, John E., Nancy G. Doerrer, Ronald N. Hines, et al.. (2015). Use of the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: human health risk assessment of the use of a pyrethroid in bed netting. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 46(1). 54–73. 9 indexed citations

19.

Moser, Virginia C., Katherine L. McDaniel, Pamela M. Phillips, & Anna Lowit. (2009). Time-Course, Dose-Response, and Age Comparative Sensitivity of N-Methyl Carbamates in Rats. Toxicological Sciences. 114(1). 113–123. 33 indexed citations

20.

Padilla, Stephanie, R. S. Marshall, Deborah L. Hunter, & Anna Lowit. (2006). Time course of cholinesterase inhibition in adult rats treated acutely with carbaryl, carbofuran, formetanate, methomyl, methiocarb, oxamyl or propoxur. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 219(2-3). 202–209. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact