Anna Lavis

1.0k total citations
46 papers, 590 citations indexed

About

Anna Lavis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Lavis has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 590 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Clinical Psychology, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 9 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Anna Lavis's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers). Anna Lavis is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers). Anna Lavis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Australia. Anna Lavis's co-authors include Max Birchwood, Vimal Sharma, Peter B. Jones, David Fowler, Swaran P. Singh, Max Marshall, Tim Amos, Helen Lester, Nick Freemantle and Linda Everard and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Anna Lavis

42 papers receiving 568 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Lavis United Kingdom	12	290	189	136	125	89	46	590
Ayşegül Durak Batıgün Türkiye	14	370 1.3×	96 0.5×	153 1.1×	132 1.1×	54 0.6×	50	597
Zoë Boden United Kingdom	11	216 0.7×	121 0.6×	95 0.7×	85 0.7×	160 1.8×	23	471
Funda Kavak Budak Türkiye	14	255 0.9×	137 0.7×	174 1.3×	93 0.7×	67 0.8×	60	534
Elspeth Twigg United Kingdom	10	542 1.9×	110 0.6×	260 1.9×	66 0.5×	112 1.3×	11	741
Victoria H. Chien United States	12	259 0.9×	225 1.2×	148 1.1×	62 0.5×	283 3.2×	14	764
Norman A. Clemens United States	10	451 1.6×	82 0.4×	159 1.2×	36 0.3×	81 0.9×	54	636
Thomas Steare United Kingdom	8	304 1.0×	70 0.4×	151 1.1×	71 0.6×	177 2.0×	19	640
Jason C. McIntyre United Kingdom	13	318 1.1×	119 0.6×	256 1.9×	203 1.6×	143 1.6×	42	720
Joaquín García‐Alandete Spain	16	413 1.4×	100 0.5×	335 2.5×	75 0.6×	93 1.0×	84	703
Lauren McGillivray Australia	14	391 1.3×	140 0.7×	189 1.4×	115 0.9×	157 1.8×	49	726

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Lavis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Lavis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Lavis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Lavis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Lavis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Lavis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Lavis. The network helps show where Anna Lavis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Lavis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Lavis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Lavis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Lavis. Anna Lavis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Greenfield, Sheila, et al.. (2025). A thematic analysis of UK COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy discussions on Twitter. BMC Public Health. 25(1). 61–61. 3 indexed citations

Bhui, Kamaldeep, et al.. (2025). Improving Research Inclusion: learning from NIHR and Research Council funded studies in England. NIHR Open Research. 5. 102–102.

Fazil, Qulsom, et al.. (2024). Protocol for a scoping review of how people with ME/CFS use the internet. BMJ Open. 14(1). e076904–e076904. 3 indexed citations

Cumming, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Dance Freelancers in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dance Education. 23(3). 190–199. 1 indexed citations

Joseph, Linju, et al.. (2023). Patients', carers' and healthcare providers' views of patient‐held health records in Kerala, India: A qualitative exploratory study. Health Expectations. 26(3). 1081–1095. 3 indexed citations

Eli, Karin, Anna Lavis, James Castleman, et al.. (2023). Maternal mental health: a key area for future research among women with congenital heart disease. Open Heart. 10(2). e002312–e002312. 1 indexed citations

Michail, Maria, Jamie Morgan, & Anna Lavis. (2023). Youth partnership in suicide prevention research: moving beyond the safety discourse. BMJ Open. 13(10). e076885–e076885. 6 indexed citations

Lavis, Anna, et al.. (2022). Self-Harm in Eating Disorders (SHINE): a mixed-methods exploratory study. BMJ Open. 12(7). e065065–e065065. 3 indexed citations

Joseph, Linju, et al.. (2022). A systematic review of home-based records in maternal and child health for improving informational continuity, health outcomes, and perceived usefulness in low and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE. 17(8). e0267192–e0267192. 6 indexed citations

10.

Gee, Brioney, Clio Berry, Joanne Hodgekins, et al.. (2022). A qualitative process evaluation of social recovery therapy for enhancement of social recovery in first-episode psychosis (SUPEREDEN3). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 51(2). 133–145. 3 indexed citations

11.

Pykett, Jessica, et al.. (2022). Urban precarity and youth mental health: An interpretive scoping review of emerging approaches. Social Science & Medicine. 320. 115619–115619. 11 indexed citations

12.

Humpston, Clara, et al.. (2022). The effectiveness of gaming interventions for depression and anxiety in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJPsych Open. 8(1). e25–e25. 14 indexed citations

13.

Drury, Nigel E, et al.. (2021). Understanding parents’ decision-making on participation in clinical trials in children’s heart surgery: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 11(2). e044896–e044896. 10 indexed citations

14.

Eli, Karin & Anna Lavis. (2021). Material Environments and the Shaping of Anorexic Embodiment: Towards A Materialist Account of Eating Disorders. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry. 46(2). 344–363. 3 indexed citations

15.

Joseph, Linju, et al.. (2021). Systematic review on the use of patient-held health records in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Open. 11(9). e046965–e046965. 5 indexed citations

16.

Lavis, Anna, et al.. (2019). Overlaps and Disjunctures: A Cultural Case Study of a British Indian Young Woman’s Experiences of Bulimia Nervosa. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry. 43(3). 361–386. 8 indexed citations

17.

Connor, Charlotte, et al.. (2018). The Development of First‐Episode Direct Self‐Injurious Behavior and Association with Difficulties in Emotional Regulation in Adolescence. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 49(5). 1266–1280. 11 indexed citations

18.

Lavis, Anna. (2016). Social Media and Anorexia: A Qualitative Analysis of #ProAna. University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham). 34(2). 57–62. 4 indexed citations

19.

Lavis, Anna, Helen Lester, Linda Everard, et al.. (2015). Layers of listening: Qualitative analysis of the impact of early intervention services for first-episode psychosis on carers' experiences. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 207(2). 135–142. 52 indexed citations

20.

Lavis, Anna. (2014). ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON EATING DISORDERS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact