This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kononiuk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kononiuk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kononiuk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kononiuk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kononiuk. The network helps show where Anna Kononiuk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Kononiuk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Kononiuk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Kononiuk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Kononiuk. Anna Kononiuk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kononiuk, Anna & Andrzej Magruk. (2016). Przegląd metod i technik badawczych stosowanych w programach foresight. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
7.
Magruk, Andrzej, et al.. (2015). Raport z działalności Grupy Wsparcia przy Komitecie Sterującym Narodowego Programu Foresight „POLSKA 2020”. CeON Repository (Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science).
8.
Kononiuk, Anna & Andrzej Magruk. (2015). Wild Cards in Polish Foresight Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 213. 951–956.7 indexed citations
9.
Nazarko, Joanicjusz, Katarzyna Dębkowska, Joanna Ejdys, et al.. (2013). Kluczowe nanotechnologie w gospodarce Podlasia. CeON Repository (Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science).2 indexed citations
10.
Glińska, Ewa & Anna Kononiuk. (2013). The Concept of Regional Strategy of Smart Specialization. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. 27–34.2 indexed citations
11.
Nazarko, Joanicjusz, Joanna Ejdys, Ewa Glińska, et al.. (2013). Podlaska strategia rozwoju nanotechnologii do 2020 roku. Przełomowa wizja regionu. CeON Repository (Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science).4 indexed citations
Nazarko, Joanicjusz, et al.. (2013). Kierunki rozwoju nanotechnologii w województwie podlaskim. Mapy. Marszruty. Trendy. CeON Repository (Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science).5 indexed citations
Kononiuk, Anna. (2012). Foresight jako nurt badawczy w naukach o zarządzaniu - stan badań w Polsce i przykłady zastosowań. Wspolczesne Zarzadzanie Kwartalnik srodowisk naukowych i liderów biznesu. 93–102.1 indexed citations
16.
Nazarko, Joanicjusz, Katarzyna Dębkowska, Joanna Ejdys, et al.. (2011). Metodologia i procedury badawcze w projekcie Foresight technologiczny "NT FOR Podlaskie 2020" : regionalna strategia rozwoju nanotechnologii.12 indexed citations
17.
Nazarko, Joanicjusz, et al.. (2011). Analiza strukturalna czynników rozwoju nanotechnologii w województwie podlaskim. CeON Repository (Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science).4 indexed citations
18.
Nazarko, Joanicjusz, et al.. (2010). Uwarunkowania rozwoju nanotechnologii w województwie podlaskim : wyniki analiz STEEPVL i SWOT. CeON Repository (Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science).10 indexed citations
19.
Kononiuk, Anna. (2009). Sposoby identyfikacji zdarzeń bezprecedensowych jako remedium na uniknięcie, bądź łagodzenie skutków potencjalnego kryzysu. 527–537.1 indexed citations
20.
Kononiuk, Anna, et al.. (2008). Przegląd projektów foresightu branżowego w Polsce. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.