Anna Kaiser

1.6k total citations
42 papers, 695 citations indexed

About

Anna Kaiser is a scholar working on Geophysics, Civil and Structural Engineering and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Kaiser has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 695 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Geophysics, 19 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering and 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Anna Kaiser's work include earthquake and tectonic studies (32 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (32 papers) and Seismic Performance and Analysis (18 papers). Anna Kaiser is often cited by papers focused on earthquake and tectonic studies (32 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (32 papers) and Seismic Performance and Analysis (18 papers). Anna Kaiser collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Switzerland and United States. Anna Kaiser's co-authors include Liam Wotherspoon, Bill Fry, H. Horstmeyer, Adrien Oth, Caroline Holden, Brendon Bradley, Robert Langridge, Rafael Benites, Alastair McClymont and Chris Van Houtte and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysics and Tectonophysics.

In The Last Decade

Anna Kaiser

40 papers receiving 671 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Kaiser New Zealand 17 520 270 111 109 85 42 695
Maria Manakou Greece 16 412 0.8× 335 1.2× 92 0.8× 38 0.3× 33 0.4× 31 607
Gonzalo Montalva Chile 14 488 0.9× 597 2.2× 31 0.3× 39 0.4× 78 0.9× 43 757
Sheri Molnar Canada 13 575 1.1× 324 1.2× 116 1.0× 59 0.5× 74 0.9× 42 667
J. J. Giner Spain 10 372 0.7× 178 0.7× 71 0.6× 53 0.5× 76 0.9× 12 442
Brian Tucker United States 13 808 1.6× 351 1.3× 108 1.0× 68 0.6× 61 0.7× 24 955
Koya Suto Netherlands 5 511 1.0× 186 0.7× 206 1.9× 98 0.9× 29 0.3× 22 551
Hamid Zafarani Iran 19 850 1.6× 825 3.1× 19 0.2× 120 1.1× 71 0.8× 80 1.2k
Giovanni Costa Italy 16 698 1.3× 642 2.4× 26 0.2× 187 1.7× 44 0.5× 71 1.0k
Masayuki Takemura Japan 12 579 1.1× 324 1.2× 52 0.5× 104 1.0× 60 0.7× 74 675
Adel M.E. Mohamed Egypt 14 340 0.7× 177 0.7× 90 0.8× 42 0.4× 23 0.3× 31 416

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Kaiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kaiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Kaiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kaiser. The network helps show where Anna Kaiser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Kaiser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Kaiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Kaiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Kaiser. Anna Kaiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
French, Blandine, Tycho J. Dekkers, Melissa H. Black, et al.. (2025). The power of words: respectful language in ADHD research. The Lancet Psychiatry. 12(12). 876–879.
2.
Hutchinson, Jesse, Chuanbin Zhu, Brendon Bradley, et al.. (2024). The 2023 New Zealand Ground-Motion Database. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 114(1). 291–310. 11 indexed citations
3.
Giallini, Silvia, Alessandro Pagliaroli, Alberto Pizzi, et al.. (2024). Reconstruction of a subsoil model for local seismic response evaluation through experimental and numerical methods: The case of the Wellington CBD, New Zealand. Engineering Geology. 330. 107413–107413. 5 indexed citations
4.
Bradley, Brendon, Sanjay Singh Bora, Robin Lee, et al.. (2023). The Ground-Motion Characterization Model for the 2022 New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 114(1). 329–349. 16 indexed citations
5.
Kaiser, Anna, Sanjay Singh Bora, Liam Wotherspoon, et al.. (2023). Overview of Site Effects and the Application of the 2022 New Zealand NSHM in the Wellington Basin, New Zealand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 114(1). 399–421. 10 indexed citations
6.
Andrews, Jennifer, Yannik Behr, Maren Böse, et al.. (2023). Rapid Earthquake Rupture Characterization for New Zealand Using the FinDer Algorithm. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 114(2). 775–793. 2 indexed citations
7.
Kaiser, Anna, et al.. (2023). A High-Resolution Site Amplification Map for Wellington, New Zealand. Seismological Research Letters. 95(1). 159–171. 5 indexed citations
8.
Bora, Sanjay Singh, Brendon Bradley, Matthew C. Gerstenberger, et al.. (2023). Hazard Sensitivities Associated with Ground-Motion Characterization Modeling for the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model Revision 2022. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 114(1). 422–448. 6 indexed citations
9.
Sonntag, Winnie Isabel, et al.. (2019). Consumer evaluation of intra-sustainable trade-offs in pig production – A mixed-method approach to analyze different consumer segments. Livestock Science. 224. 102–113. 17 indexed citations
10.
Gledhill, K. R., et al.. (2018). Toward operational tsunami early warning in New Zealand. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2018. 1 indexed citations
11.
Bradley, Brendon, Liam Wotherspoon, & Anna Kaiser. (2017). Ground motion and site effect observations in the wellington region from the 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. 50(2). 94–105. 24 indexed citations
12.
Benites, Rafael, R. M. Langridge, Yoshihiro Kaneko, et al.. (2017). A multiple fault rupture model of the November 13 2016, M 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand. AGUFM. 2017.
13.
Kaiser, Anna, Chris Van Houtte, N. D. Perrin, Liam Wotherspoon, & G. H. McVerry. (2017). Site characterisation of GeoNet stations for the New Zealand Strong Motion Database. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. 50(1). 39–49. 43 indexed citations
14.
Holden, Caroline & Anna Kaiser. (2016). Stochastic ground motion modelling of the largest M w 5.9 + aftershocks of the Canterbury 2010–2011 earthquake sequence. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 59(1). 187–201. 2 indexed citations
15.
Massey, Chris, Mauri McSaveney, Caroline Holden, et al.. (2015). Performance of Rock Slopes during the 2010/11 Canterbury Earthquakes (New Zealand). 2 indexed citations
16.
Houtte, Chris Van, Olga‐Joan Ktenidou, Tam Larkin, & Anna Kaiser. (2012). Reference stations for Christchurch. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. 45(4). 184–195. 14 indexed citations
17.
Kaiser, Anna, et al.. (2011). Detailed images of the shallow Alpine Fault Zone, New Zealand, determined from narrow-azimuth 3D seismic reflection data. Geophysics. 76(1). B19–B32. 16 indexed citations
18.
20.
Kaiser, Anna, A. G. Green, H. Horstmeyer, et al.. (2009). Ultrahigh‐resolution seismic reflection imaging of the Alpine Fault, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 114(B11). 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026