Anna E. Buehler

567 total citations
8 papers, 365 citations indexed

About

Anna E. Buehler is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna E. Buehler has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 365 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 3 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in Anna E. Buehler's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers). Anna E. Buehler is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers). Anna E. Buehler collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Anna E. Buehler's co-authors include Scott D. Halpern, Emily Rubin, Nicole B. Gabler, Elizabeth Cooney, Mark E. Mikkelsen, Saida Kent, Michael O. Harhay, Michael E. Detsky, Aaron M. Delman and Sarah J. Ratcliffe and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, JAMA Internal Medicine and JAMA Network Open.

In The Last Decade

Anna E. Buehler

7 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna E. Buehler United States 7 154 110 76 76 70 8 365
Anne L. Donovan United States 9 97 0.6× 87 0.8× 152 2.0× 72 0.9× 24 0.3× 13 452
Lior Bibas Canada 10 182 1.2× 220 2.0× 91 1.2× 67 0.9× 33 0.5× 20 569
Hildy Schell‐Chaple United States 7 82 0.5× 98 0.9× 108 1.4× 73 1.0× 37 0.5× 21 342
Laurent Montésino France 4 90 0.6× 46 0.4× 52 0.7× 44 0.6× 80 1.1× 6 365
Thomas Pelgrim Netherlands 8 83 0.5× 49 0.4× 34 0.4× 74 1.0× 139 2.0× 19 518
C.J. Cabilan Australia 14 69 0.4× 84 0.8× 29 0.4× 116 1.5× 91 1.3× 43 571
Lorenzo Boncinelli Italy 9 92 0.6× 171 1.6× 95 1.3× 34 0.4× 72 1.0× 21 429
Diane Byrum United States 5 74 0.5× 128 1.2× 164 2.2× 72 0.9× 200 2.9× 10 524
Dawn Opgenorth Canada 9 64 0.4× 42 0.4× 47 0.6× 95 1.3× 112 1.6× 22 347
Kay H. Stricker Switzerland 11 210 1.4× 274 2.5× 151 2.0× 106 1.4× 76 1.1× 12 577

Countries citing papers authored by Anna E. Buehler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna E. Buehler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna E. Buehler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna E. Buehler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna E. Buehler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna E. Buehler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna E. Buehler. The network helps show where Anna E. Buehler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna E. Buehler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna E. Buehler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna E. Buehler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna E. Buehler. Anna E. Buehler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Rubin, Emily, Anna E. Buehler, & Scott D. Halpern. (2020). Seriously Ill Patients’ Willingness to Trade Survival Time to Avoid High Treatment Intensity at the End of Life. JAMA Internal Medicine. 180(6). 907–907. 30 indexed citations
2.
Chaiyachati, Krisda H., Joshua M. Liao, Gary E. Weissman, et al.. (2019). Gender Differences in Retention and Promotion Among Generalists Who Graduated From Research-Intensive Fellowships. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 11(5). 535–542. 8 indexed citations
3.
Rubin, Emily, et al.. (2019). Intuitive vs Deliberative Approaches to Making Decisions About Life Support. JAMA Network Open. 2(1). e187851–e187851. 12 indexed citations
4.
Buehler, Anna E., Aaron M. Delman, Saida Kent, et al.. (2018). Contributors to Intensive Care Unit Clinicians’ Predictions of Patient Outcomes: A Qualitative Analysis. American Journal of Critical Care. 27(6). 445–453.
5.
Detsky, Michael E., Rachel Kohn, Aaron M. Delman, et al.. (2018). Patients' perceptions and ICU clinicians predictions of quality of life following critical illness. Journal of Critical Care. 48. 352–356. 12 indexed citations
6.
Detsky, Michael E., Michael O. Harhay, Aaron M. Delman, et al.. (2017). Six-Month Morbidity and Mortality among Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Life-Sustaining Therapy. A Prospective Cohort Study. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 14(10). 1562–1570. 30 indexed citations
7.
Detsky, Michael E., Michael O. Harhay, Aaron M. Delman, et al.. (2017). Discriminative Accuracy of Physician and Nurse Predictions for Survival and Functional Outcomes 6 Months After an ICU Admission. JAMA. 317(21). 2187–2187. 121 indexed citations
8.
Rubin, Emily, Anna E. Buehler, & Scott D. Halpern. (2016). States Worse Than Death Among Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illnesses. JAMA Internal Medicine. 176(10). 1557–1557. 152 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026