Countries citing papers authored by Anna Cardinaletti
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Cardinaletti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Cardinaletti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Cardinaletti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Cardinaletti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Cardinaletti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Cardinaletti. The network helps show where Anna Cardinaletti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Cardinaletti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Cardinaletti.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Cardinaletti based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Cardinaletti. Anna Cardinaletti is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. (2015). Il determinante indefinito: analisi sintattica e variazione diatopica. ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia). 59. 451–466.1 indexed citations
7.
Geraci, Carlo, et al.. (2014). Addressing the Cardinals Puzzle: New Insights from Non-Manual Markers in Italian Sign Language. Language Resources and Evaluation.2 indexed citations
Santoro, Mirko, et al.. (2010). Why are you raising your eyebrows. Language Resources and Evaluation.1 indexed citations
10.
Geraci, Carlo, Robert Bayley, Chiara Branchini, et al.. (2010). “Building a corpus for Italian Sign Language: Methodological issues and some preliminary results”. Language Resources and Evaluation. 98–101.10 indexed citations
11.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Lori Repetti. (2008). The Phonology and Syntax of Subject Clitics in Interrogative Sentences. Linguistic Inquiry. 523–563.1 indexed citations
Cardinaletti, Anna & Lori Repetti. (2004). Clitics in Northern Italian Dialects: Phonology, Syntax and Microvariation. ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia). 14. 7–106.6 indexed citations
14.
Cardinaletti, Anna. (1999). Italian "emphatic pronouns" are postverbal subjects. ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia). 9. 59–92.9 indexed citations
15.
Cardinaletti, Anna. (1997). Agreement and control in expletive constructions. Linguistic Inquiry. 28(3). 521–533.31 indexed citations
16.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. (1991). Il sessismo nella lingua italiana. Riflessioni sui lavori di Alma Sabatini (Sexism in the Italian Language: Reflections on the Works of Alma Sabatini).. 23(2).1 indexed citations
17.
Cardinaletti, Anna. (1990). Es, pro and sentential arguments in German. ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia). 126. 135–164.7 indexed citations
18.
Cardinaletti, Anna. (1990). Impersonal constructions and sentential arguments in German. ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia).28 indexed citations
19.
Cardinaletti, Anna. (1990). Recensione a G. Fanselow/S. Felix, Sprachtheorie. Bd.1: Grundlagen und Zielsetzungen; Bd.2: Die Rektions- und Bindungstheorie, Francke Verlag, Tuebingen, 1987. ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia). 43. 131–134.3 indexed citations
20.
Cardinaletti, Anna. (1986). Topicalization in German: Movement to Comp or base-generation in Top?in Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia). 28. 203–231.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.