Anna Brajter‐Toth

3.0k citations
91 papers · 2.7k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Brajter‐Toth

90 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Anna Brajter‐Toth
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Electrochemistry 1.4k
  • Bioengineering 840
  • Polymers and Plastics 654
  • Spectroscopy 480
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.6k
Replace Esma Kιlιç with:
Esma Kιlιç Türkiye
Y. M. Temerk Egypt
Toshihiko Imato Japan
S. Sriman Narayanan India
Elisa González‐Romero Spain
Chantal Degrand France
Henry N. Blount United States
J. Volke Czechia
Mehmet Aslanoğlu Türkiye
M. Dale Hawley United States
Anna Brajter‐Toth relative to Esma Kιlιç Türkiye Esma Kιlιç's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Esma Kιlιç · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Brajter‐Toth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Brajter‐Toth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Brajter‐Toth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Brajter‐Toth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Brajter‐Toth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Brajter‐Toth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Brajter‐Toth. The network helps show where Anna Brajter‐Toth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Brajter‐Toth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Brajter‐Toth Line = papers co-authored together Anna Brajter‐Toth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994142
2 1992122
3 1996115
4 1991104
5 199295
6 199591
7 198973
8 198273
9 198772
10 199069
11 199668
12 199967
13 200066
14 199856
15 199754
16 199151
17 198851
18 198146
19 199744
20 200844

About Anna Brajter‐Toth

Anna Brajter‐Toth is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electrochemistry, Bioengineering, Spectroscopy and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (55 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (53 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (30 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (15 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (11 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (9 papers) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (1.4k citations), Bioengineering (840 citations), Polymers and Plastics (654 citations), Spectroscopy (480 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.6k citations). Anna Brajter‐Toth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Quan Cheng, Chen-Chan Hsueh, Michael S. Freund, Kevin J. Volk, Richard A. Yost, Glenn Dryhurst, Kevin F. McKenna, John R. Eyler, Rajendra N. Goyal and Roberto Bravo. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Electroanalysis, Analytica Chimica Acta, The Analyst and Electrochimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact