Ann Thornton

538 total citations
8 papers, 50 citations indexed

About

Ann Thornton is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Information Systems and Library and Information Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann Thornton has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 50 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 2 papers in Information Systems and 2 papers in Library and Information Sciences. Recurrent topics in Ann Thornton's work include Coastal and Marine Management (2 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers). Ann Thornton is often cited by papers focused on Coastal and Marine Management (2 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers). Ann Thornton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Ann Thornton's co-authors include Tatsuya Amano, Marc W. Cadotte, Mark H. Hancock, Harriet Downey, William J. Sutherland, Nancy Ockendon, Tiziana Luisetti, Gaetano Grilli, Deanna Donovan and Trevor Stewart and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Arthropod-Plant Interactions and Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship.

In The Last Decade

Ann Thornton

8 papers receiving 49 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ann Thornton United Kingdom	4	20	15	14	10	7	8	50
Anna M. Chenery United Kingdom	4	30 1.5×	21 1.4×	12 0.9×	5 0.5×	5 0.7×	4	51
Agnieszka Pawłowska-Mainville Canada	3	27 1.4×	7 0.5×	12 0.9×	12 1.2×	4 0.6×	6	60
Jamie Rappaport Clark Israel	2	11 0.6×	19 1.3×	8 0.6×	3 0.3×	10 1.4×	3	38
Sonali Ghosh India	3	39 1.9×	35 2.3×	15 1.1×	6 0.6×	14 2.0×	9	70
Hirma Ramírez United States	3	45 2.3×	6 0.4×	9 0.6×	8 0.8×	8 1.1×	3	67
M’Lisa Colbert Australia	4	35 1.8×	7 0.5×	9 0.6×	8 0.8×	2 0.3×	4	57
Katia Sánchez-Ortiz United Kingdom	3	17 0.8×	17 1.1×	4 0.3×	5 0.5×	20 2.9×	4	48
Annie Brett United States	3	20 1.0×	9 0.6×	9 0.6×	3 0.3×	4 0.6×	7	61
Stephanie Prior United Kingdom	4	23 1.1×	40 2.7×	8 0.6×	6 0.6×	18 2.6×	6	81
Christina Seeberg‐Elverfeldt Italy	5	42 2.1×	29 1.9×	14 1.0×	19 1.9×	3 0.4×	7	85

Countries citing papers authored by Ann Thornton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Thornton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Thornton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Thornton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Thornton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Thornton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Thornton. The network helps show where Ann Thornton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Thornton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Thornton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Thornton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Thornton. Ann Thornton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Grilli, Gaetano, Tiziana Luisetti, Ann Thornton, & Deanna Donovan. (2022). Developing ecosystem accounts for the marine and coastal environment: Limitations, opportunities and lessons learned from the United Kingdom experience.. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 8(2). 9 indexed citations

2.

Ockendon, Nancy, Tatsuya Amano, Marc W. Cadotte, et al.. (2021). Effectively integrating experiments into conservation practice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(2). 26 indexed citations

3.

Franklin, Elizabeth, et al.. (2016). Exploring the predation of UK bumblebees (Apidae, Bombus spp.) by the invasive pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea: examining the effects of annual variation, seasonal variation, plant density and bumblebee gender. Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 11(1). 79–88. 2 indexed citations

4.

Thornton, Ann, et al.. (2012). Nuclear power: ecologically sustainable or energy hot potato? A case study. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 5(3/4). 181–181. 3 indexed citations

5.

Thornton, Ann, et al.. (2010). The Severn tidal barrage project: A legal paradox?. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 3 indexed citations

6.

Thornton, Ann. (1999). Teaching the library at SIBL. Computers in Libraries archive. 19(2). 50–55. 5 indexed citations

7.

Thornton, Ann. (1998). The Impact of the Web on User Education at the Science, Industry and Business Library (SIBL) of The New York Public Library. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship. 4(1). 35–44. 1 indexed citations

8.

Stewart, Trevor & Ann Thornton. (1992). Using regression analysis to assist audit judgments in substantive testing. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact