Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
TaintDroid: an information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones
20101.5k citationsWilliam Enck, Peter Gilbert et al.Operating Systems Design and Implementationprofile →
Tool release
20111.3k citationsDaniel Halperin, Wenjun Hu et al.ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Reviewprofile →
TaintDroid
2014772 citationsWilliam Enck, Peter Gilbert et al.ACM Transactions on Computer Systemsprofile →
Predictable 802.11 packet delivery from wireless channel measurements
2010496 citationsDaniel Halperin, Wenjun Hu et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Anmol Sheth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anmol Sheth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anmol Sheth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anmol Sheth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anmol Sheth. The network helps show where Anmol Sheth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anmol Sheth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anmol Sheth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anmol Sheth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anmol Sheth. Anmol Sheth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Enck, William, Peter Gilbert, Seungyeop Han, et al.. (2014). TaintDroid. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. 32(2). 1–29.772 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Rodden, Tom & Anmol Sheth. (2012). HomeSys. 1085–1089.1 indexed citations
Enck, William, Peter Gilbert, Byung-Gon Chun, et al.. (2010). TaintDroid: an information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones. Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 393–407.1543 indexed citations breakdown →
Liu, Xi, Anmol Sheth, Michael Kaminsky, et al.. (2009). DIRC. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 39(4). 171–182.19 indexed citations
9.
Jung, Jaeyeon, et al.. (2008). Privacy oracle. 279–288.54 indexed citations
10.
Patra, Rabin, et al.. (2007). WiLdnet: design and implementation of high performancewifi based long distance networks. Networked Systems Design and Implementation. 7–7.222 indexed citations
Carlson, James, Haibo Dai, Jeff Rose, et al.. (2003). MANTIS. 50–59.127 indexed citations
18.
Sheth, Anmol, Brian Shucker, & Richard Han. (2002). VLM2: A Very Lightweight Mobile Multicast System for Wireless Sensor Networks ; CU-CS-938-02. CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder).5 indexed citations
19.
Sheth, Anmol & Richard Han. (2002). An Implementation of Transmit Power Control in 802.11b Wireless Networks ; CU-CS-934-02. CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder).8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.