Ank de Jonge

4.8k total citations
142 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Ank de Jonge is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ank de Jonge has authored 142 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 103 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 77 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 35 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ank de Jonge's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (96 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (37 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (32 papers). Ank de Jonge is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (96 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (37 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (32 papers). Ank de Jonge collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Australia. Ank de Jonge's co-authors include Corine Verhoeven, Ben W. Mol, Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen, A. L. M. Lagro-Janssen, S. E. Buitendijk, Jeroen van Dillen, Trudy Klomp, Caroline C. Geerts, Eileen K. Hutton and Judith Manniën and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Membrane Science and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

Ank de Jonge

129 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ank de Jonge Netherlands	30	1.8k	1.4k	931	577	533	142	2.9k
Mirjam Lukasse Norway	28	1.4k 0.8×	816 0.6×	956 1.0×	706 1.2×	558 1.0×	98	2.6k
Kathrin Stoll Canada	27	2.1k 1.1×	1.5k 1.0×	1.1k 1.1×	825 1.4×	531 1.0×	94	3.0k
Fernanda Garanhani Surita Brazil	31	1.8k 1.0×	1.5k 1.1×	1.2k 1.3×	198 0.3×	507 1.0×	176	3.1k
Helen Spiby United Kingdom	30	1.2k 0.7×	752 0.5×	1.2k 1.3×	802 1.4×	524 1.0×	117	2.7k
Ruth C. Fretts United States	24	2.0k 1.1×	2.5k 1.7×	567 0.6×	538 0.9×	395 0.7×	36	3.7k
Geraldine Barrett United Kingdom	25	1.2k 0.6×	1.3k 0.9×	1.8k 2.0×	175 0.3×	777 1.5×	76	3.1k
Sue Kildea Australia	34	1.6k 0.9×	1.4k 1.0×	927 1.0×	803 1.4×	775 1.5×	178	3.5k
Nina Marković United States	29	1.2k 0.7×	1.1k 0.8×	515 0.6×	277 0.5×	311 0.6×	90	3.0k
Ingela Rådestad Sweden	33	2.1k 1.2×	1.5k 1.1×	2.1k 2.3×	1.7k 3.0×	379 0.7×	114	3.9k
Lee A. Learman United States	30	1.8k 1.0×	1.2k 0.9×	1.0k 1.1×	212 0.4×	281 0.5×	99	3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Ank de Jonge

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ank de Jonge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ank de Jonge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ank de Jonge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ank de Jonge

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ank de Jonge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ank de Jonge. The network helps show where Ank de Jonge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ank de Jonge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ank de Jonge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ank de Jonge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ank de Jonge. Ank de Jonge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pajkrt, Eva, et al.. (2025). Understanding how midwife-led continuity of care can be implemented and under what circumstances: a realist review. BMJ Open. 15(2). e091968–e091968. 4 indexed citations

Gravesteijn, Benjamin, Roseriet Beijers, Loes C.M. Bertens, et al.. (2025). Choosing for a Homebirth during COVID-19 Lockdown in The Netherlands, who and why: A national prospective questionnaire study. Midwifery. 144. 104361–104361.

Sinatti, Giulia, et al.. (2025). Emotional labour in midwifery care: Balancing between woman’s autonomy and clinical control during childbirth through watchful attendance. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health. 7. 100546–100546.

Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne, et al.. (2024). Working in smaller teams in community midwifery practices to foster continuity of carer: Midwives’ experiences – A qualitative study in the Netherlands. Women and Birth. 37(6). 101663–101663. 1 indexed citations

Schuitmaker‐Warnaar, Tjerk Jan, et al.. (2024). Bridging Perspectives, Building Resilience: Safety-II Guided Reflexive Dialogues Between Care Professionals and Clients as Part of Developing Integrated Maternity Care. International Journal of Integrated Care. 24(4). 4–4.

Neal, Sarah, Zoë Matthews, Carol Kingdon, et al.. (2023). Assessing safe and personalised maternity and neonatal care through a pandemic: a case study of outcomes and experiences in two trusts in England using the ASPIRE COVID-19 framework. BMC Health Services Research. 23(1). 675–675. 3 indexed citations

Seijmonsbergen‐Schermers, Anna E., Lilian L. Peters, Corine Verhoeven, et al.. (2023). Trends in postpartum hemorrhage and manual removal of the placenta and the association with childbirth interventions: A Dutch nationwide cohort study. Birth. 51(1). 98–111. 1 indexed citations

Henrichs, Jens, et al.. (2023). Implication of third‐trimester screening accuracy for small‐for‐gestational age and additive value of third‐trimester growth‐trajectory indicators in predicting severe adverse perinatal outcome in low‐risk population: pragmatic secondary analysis of IRIS study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 62(2). 209–218. 3 indexed citations

Jonge, Ank de, et al.. (2023). The Impact of Mode of Birth, and Episiotomy, on Postpartum Sexual Function in the Medium- and Longer-Term: An Integrative Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(7). 5252–5252. 8 indexed citations

10.

Henrichs, Jens, Corine Verhoeven, Arie Franx, et al.. (2023). Predictive value of fetal growth trajectory from 20 weeks of gestation onwards for severe adverse perinatal outcome in low‐risk population: secondary analysis of IRIS study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 62(6). 796–804. 6 indexed citations

11.

Verhoeven, Corine, et al.. (2022). Models of Risk Selection in Maternal and Newborn Care: Exploring the Organization of Tasks and Responsibilities of Primary Care Midwives and Obstetricians in Risk Selection across The Netherlands. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(3). 1046–1046. 1 indexed citations

12.

Thomson, Gill, et al.. (2022). Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the Babies Born Better survey in the UK and the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 17(11). e0267415–e0267415. 8 indexed citations

13.

Kennedy, Holly Powell, Marie‐Clare Balaam, Hannah Dahlen, et al.. (2020). The role of midwifery and other international insights for maternity care in the United States: An analysis of four countries. Birth. 47(4). 332–345. 28 indexed citations

14.

Witteveen, Anke B., Jens Henrichs, Ernst T. Bohlmeijer, et al.. (2020). Effectiveness of a guided ACT-based self-help resilience training for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial embedded in a prospective cohort. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 20(1). 705–705. 5 indexed citations

15.

Peters, Lilian L., Charlene Thornton, Ank de Jonge, et al.. (2018). The effect of medical and operative birth interventions on child health outcomes in the first 28 days and up to 5 years of age: A linked data population‐based cohort study. Birth. 45(4). 347–357. 71 indexed citations

16.

Geerts, Caroline C., Jeroen van Dillen, Trudy Klomp, Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen, & Ank de Jonge. (2017). Satisfaction with caregivers during labour among low risk women in the Netherlands: the association with planned place of birth and transfer of care during labour. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 17(1). 229–229. 10 indexed citations

17.

Prins, Marianne, Jeroen van Dillen, & Ank de Jonge. (2014). [Advantages of midwife-led continuity model of care].. PubMed. 157. A7070–A7070. 5 indexed citations

18.

Martin, Linda, Sandra van Dulmen, Evelien Spelten, et al.. (2013). Prenatal counseling for congenital anomaly tests: parental preferences and perceptions of midwife performance. Prenatal Diagnosis. 33(4). 341–353. 34 indexed citations

19.

Jonge, Ank de, et al.. (2007). Increased blood loss in upright birthing positions originates from perineal damage. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 114(3). 349–355. 29 indexed citations

20.

Jonge, Ank de, Doreth Teunissen, & A. L. M. Lagro-Janssen. (2004). Geen goede argumenten voor de rugligging als standaardbaringshouding tijdens de uitdrijving; een meta-analyse. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 148(23). 1146–1150. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact